244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32599815)
1. Prognostic Impact of Active Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction, Results from the Culprit-Shock Trial.
Feistritzer HJ; Desch S; Freund A; Poess J; Zeymer U; Ouarrak T; Schneider S; de Waha-Thiele S; Fuernau G; Eitel I; Noc M; Stepinska J; Huber K; Thiele H
J Clin Med; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32599815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Kondo T; Araki T; Imaizumi T; Sumita Y; Nakai M; Tanaka A; Okumura T; Butt JH; Petrie MC; McMurray JJV; Murohara T
JACC Asia; 2023 Feb; 3(1):122-134. PubMed ID: 36873766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Ouweneel DM; Eriksen E; Sjauw KD; van Dongen IM; Hirsch A; Packer EJ; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 27810347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Thiele H; Jobs A; Ouweneel DM; Henriques JPS; Seyfarth M; Desch S; Eitel I; Pöss J; Fuernau G; de Waha S
Eur Heart J; 2017 Dec; 38(47):3523-3531. PubMed ID: 29020341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Culprit lesion location and outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.
Fuernau G; Fengler K; Desch S; Eitel I; Neumann FJ; Olbrich HG; de Waha A; de Waha S; Richardt G; Hennersdorf M; Empen K; Hambrecht R; Jung C; Böhm M; Pöss J; Strasser RH; Schneider S; Ouarrak T; Schuler G; Werdan K; Zeymer U; Thiele H
Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 105(12):1030-1041. PubMed ID: 27378612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous assist devices in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: Review, meta-analysis.
Romeo F; Acconcia MC; Sergi D; Romeo A; Francioni S; Chiarotti F; Caretta Q
World J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 8(1):98-111. PubMed ID: 26839661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Important role of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Truby L; Naka Y; Kalesan B; Ota T; Kirtane AJ; Kodali S; Nikic N; Mundy L; Colombo P; Jorde UP; Takayama H
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Aug; 48(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 25480935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mechanical circulatory support in refractory cardiogenic shock: retrospective register study].
Savvinova PP; Manchurov VN; Haes BL; Skrypnik DV; Vasilieva EJ; Shpektor AV
Ter Arkh; 2022 Oct; 94(9):1094-1098. PubMed ID: 36286761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock despite Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump: Opportunities for Advanced Mechanical Circulatory Support in Asia.
Lin W; Yip ACL; Cherian R; Chan SP; Evangelista LKM; Sari NY; Ling HS; Lim YC; Wong RCC; Tung BWL; Tan LL; Low AF; Ambhore AA; Lim SL
Life (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 38792598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital market concentration and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Vohra AS; Jang SJ; Feldman DN; Goyal P; Krishnan U; Sciria C; Cheung JW; Kim LK
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Jan; 22(1):89. PubMed ID: 35045849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of Renal Function in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With or Without Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Upadhyaya VD; Alshami A; Patel I; Douedi S; Quinlan A; Thomas T; Prentice J; Calderon D; Asif A; Sen S; Mehra A; Hossain MA
J Clin Med Res; 2021 May; 13(5):283-292. PubMed ID: 34104280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Editor's Choice- Impact of immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention on 1-year outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Results of the randomised IABP-SHOCK II trial.
Zeymer U; Werdan K; Schuler G; Zahn R; Neumann FJ; Fürnau G; de Waha S; Schneider S; Thiele H
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2017 Oct; 6(7):601-609. PubMed ID: 27655918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Racial Disparities in the Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock.
Vojjini R; Patlolla SH; Cheungpasitporn W; Kumar A; Sundaragiri PR; Doshi RP; Jaffe AS; Barsness GW; Holmes DR; Rab ST; Vallabhajosyula S
J Clin Med; 2021 Apr; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 33918132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impella versus Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Batchelor RJ; Wheelahan A; Zheng WC; Stub D; Yang Y; Chan W
J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
