188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32601761)
1. Trends in utilization, conversion rates, and outcomes for minimally invasive approaches to non-metastatic rectal cancer: a national cancer database analysis.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Sparks AD; Boulos S; Cavallo K; Kim G; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3154-3165. PubMed ID: 32601761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical resection of T4 colon cancers: an NCDB propensity score-matched analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.
Parascandola SA; Horsey ML; Hota S; Sparks AD; Tampo MMT; Kim G; Obias V
J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):701-710. PubMed ID: 33104963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted resection of T4 rectal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a national cancer database.
Emile SH; Horesh N; Freund MR; Garoufalia Z; Gefen R; Silva-Alvarenga E; Dasilva G; Wexner SD
Br J Surg; 2023 Jan; 110(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 36471483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched study comparing open and minimally invasive approaches using the national cancer database.
Horsey ML; Sparks AD; Lai D; Herur-Raman A; Ng M; Obias V
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 36(12):2739-2747. PubMed ID: 34536115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?
Ackerman SJ; Daniel S; Baik R; Liu E; Mehendale S; Tackett S; Hellan M
J Med Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 29065737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
Facer B; Wang F; Grijalva CG; Alvarez RD; Shu XO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 31715149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
