160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32601770)
1. Phantom and clinical evaluation of bone SPECT/CT image reconstruction with xSPECT algorithm.
Miyaji N; Miwa K; Tokiwa A; Ichikawa H; Terauchi T; Koizumi M; Onoguchi M
EJNMMI Res; 2020 Jun; 10(1):71. PubMed ID: 32601770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ROC study and SUV threshold using quantitative multi-modal SPECT for bone imaging.
Vija AH; Bartenstein PA; Froelich JW; Kuwert T; Macapinlac H; Daignault CP; Gowda N; Hadjiev O; Hephzibah J; Huang P; Ilhan H; Jessop A; Cachovan M; Ma J; Ding X; Spence D; Platsch G; Szabo Z
Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2019 Jun; 3(1):10. PubMed ID: 34191147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of ultra-high-speed acquisition in xSPECT bone algorithm: a phantom study with advanced bone SPECT-specific phantom.
Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Onoguchi M; Shibutani T; Nagaki A; Kato T; Shimada H
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):183-190. PubMed ID: 34731435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detectability of cold tumors by xSPECT bone technology compared with hot tumors: a supine phantom study.
Shibutani T; Konishi T; Ichikawa H; Onoguchi M; Yoneyama H; Ito T; Okuda K; Nakajima K
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 47(1):287-294. PubMed ID: 38117462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of Noise and Resolution for Quantitative
Tran-Gia J; Lassmann M
J Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 60(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 29976698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of xSPECT, xSPECT bone and Broadquant from literature, clinical survey and innovative phantom study with task-based image quality assessment.
Hoog C; Verrecchia-Ramos E; Dejust S; Lalire P; Sezin G; Moubtakir A; El Farsaoui K; Caquot PA; Guendouzen S; Morland D; Papathanassiou D
Phys Med; 2023 Aug; 112():102611. PubMed ID: 37329742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new SPECT/CT reconstruction algorithm: reliability and accuracy in clinical routine for non-oncologic bone diseases.
Delcroix O; Robin P; Gouillou M; Le Duc-Pennec A; Alavi Z; Le Roux PY; Abgral R; Salaun PY; Bourhis D; Querellou S
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Feb; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 29435671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of Number of Iterations as a Reconstruction Parameter in Bone SPECT Imaging Using a Novel Thoracic Spine Phantom.
Fukami M; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T
J Nucl Med Technol; 2021 Jun; 49(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 33361180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of
Alqahtani MM; Willowson KP; Constable C; Fulton R; Kench PL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13528. PubMed ID: 35049129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of reconstruction parameters on quantitative bone SPECT imaging: A novel thoracic spine phantom study.
Hishikawa M; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22 Suppl 2():140. PubMed ID: 31802053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Novel Incorporation of CT-based Segment Mapping into a Conjugated Gradient Algorithm on Bone SPECT Imaging: Fundamental Characteristics of a Context-specific Reconstruction Method.
Okuda K; Fujii S; Sakimoto S
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2019; 7(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 30705911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative Analysis of Multimodal Skeletal SPECT/CT Reconstructions in Diagnosing Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.
Beck MT; Rugel G; Reinfelder J; Kuwert T; Ritt P; Kreissel S; Schlittenbauer T
Nuklearmedizin; 2021 Dec; 60(6):403-410. PubMed ID: 34380154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimizing Image Quantification for
Tran-Gia J; Lassmann M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Apr; 59(4):616-624. PubMed ID: 29097409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of metal implants on xSPECT/CT Bone reconstruction: the "shining metal artefact".
Lima TVM; Bhure U; Pérez Lago MS; Thali Y; Matijasevic S; Roos J; Strobel K
Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2020 Oct; 4(1):18. PubMed ID: 34191170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of the Pixel Sizes of Reference Computed Tomography on Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Image Reconstruction Using Conjugate-gradient Algorithm].
Okuda K; Sakimoto S; Fujii S; Ida T; Moriyama S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(10):1039-1044. PubMed ID: 29057775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of 3DOSEM and MAP algorithms for reconstructing low count SPECT acquisitions.
Grootjans W; Meeuwis AP; Slump CH; de Geus-Oei LF; Gotthardt M; Visser EP
Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):311-322. PubMed ID: 26725165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of advanced iterative reconstruction methods for SPECT/CT.
Knoll P; Kotalova D; Köchle G; Kuzelka I; Minear G; Mirzaei S; Sámal M; Zadrazil L; Bergmann H
Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21723716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a digital phantom developed by QIBA for harmonizing SUVs obtained from the state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter study.
Nakahara T; Daisaki H; Yamamoto Y; Iimori T; Miyagawa K; Okamoto T; Owaki Y; Yada N; Sawada K; Tokorodani R; Jinzaki M
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):53. PubMed ID: 28639254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study.
Peters SMB; van der Werf NR; Segbers M; van Velden FHP; Wierts R; Blokland KJAK; Konijnenberg MW; Lazarenko SV; Visser EP; Gotthardt M
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):29. PubMed ID: 31879813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
