These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32603618)

  • 1. Suprathreshold Differences in Competing Speech Perception in Older Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing.
    Venezia JH; Leek MR; Lindeman MP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2141-2161. PubMed ID: 32603618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of the Spectrotemporal Modulations That Support Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Venezia JH; Martin AG; Hickok G; Richards VM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1051-1067. PubMed ID: 30986140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.
    Woods DL; Arbogast T; Doss Z; Younus M; Herron TJ; Yund EW
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0114922. PubMed ID: 25730423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
    Flaherty MM; Browning J; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):1084-1096. PubMed ID: 33538428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
    Jensen KK; Bernstein JGW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2113. PubMed ID: 31046298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 59(5):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 27603264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Perceived Sentence Clarity for Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Ferguson SH; Morgan SD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):159-173. PubMed ID: 29270637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Léger AC; Ives DT; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():102-9. PubMed ID: 25124152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention.
    Fuglsang SA; Märcher-Rørsted J; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 32094201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers.
    Best V; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1616-25. PubMed ID: 21428524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.
    Helfer KS; Poissant SF; Merchant GR
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):603-614. PubMed ID: 31567564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judgments of Emotion in Clear and Conversational Speech by Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.
    Morgan SD; Ferguson SH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2271-2280. PubMed ID: 28687824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.