124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32604387)
1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Venous Stents at 1.5 T: Susceptibility Artifacts and Radiofrequency Shielding.
Reiss S; Özen AC; Lottner T; Reichert A; Massmann A; Bock M
Invest Radiol; 2020 Nov; 55(11):741-746. PubMed ID: 32604387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artifact quantification of venous stents in the MRI environment: Differences between braided and laser-cut designs.
Reiss S; Özen AC; Lottner T; Dlaikan-Campos N; Düring K; Massmann A; Bock M
Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():1-8. PubMed ID: 34147868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical Properties of Venous Stents: An Experimental Comparison.
Dabir D; Feisst A; Thomas D; Luetkens JA; Meyer C; Kardulovic A; Menne M; Steinseifer U; Schild HH; Kuetting DLR
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Jun; 41(6):942-950. PubMed ID: 29492633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative assessment of biliary stent artifacts on MR images: Potential implications for target delineation in radiotherapy.
Gurney-Champion OJ; Bruins Slot T; Lens E; van der Horst A; Klaassen R; van Laarhoven HW; van Tienhoven G; van Hooft JE; Nederveen AJ; Bel A
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5603. PubMed ID: 27782717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. rf enhancement and shielding in MRI caused by conductive implants: dependence on electrical parameters for a tube model.
Graf H; Steidle G; Lauer UA; Schick F
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 15789577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Venous Stents: Current Status and Future Directions.
Shamimi-Noori SM; Clark TWI
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Jun; 21(2):113-116. PubMed ID: 29784119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: A systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths.
Klemm T; Duda S; Machann J; Seekamp-Rahn K; Schnieder L; Claussen CD; Schick F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Oct; 12(4):606-15. PubMed ID: 11042644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Imaging Parameter Optimization of 3D Phase Contrast-MRA to Reduce Susceptibility-artifact and Radiofrequency-shielding around the Intracranial Stent].
Kiriki M; Jomoto W; Ikeda T; Kotoura N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(11):1293-1301. PubMed ID: 30464097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)].
Graf H; Klemm T; Lauer UA; Duda S; Claussen CD; Schick F
Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1711-9. PubMed ID: 14661144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography.
Maintz D; Kugel H; Schellhammer F; Landwehr P
Invest Radiol; 2001 Apr; 36(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 11283419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents.
Wang Y; Truong TN; Yen C; Bilecen D; Watts R; Trost DW; Prince MR
Magn Reson Med; 2003 May; 49(5):972-6. PubMed ID: 12704782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Magnetic resonance imaging of stents: quantitative in vitro examination at 3 Tesla].
Reinhardt J; Nguyen-Trong TH; Hähnel S; Bellemann ME; Heiland S
Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 19995528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents.
Bartels LW; Smits HF; Bakker CJ; Viergever MA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2001 Mar; 12(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 11287516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observation and correction of transient cavitation-induced PRFS thermometry artifacts during radiofrequency ablation, using simultaneous ultrasound/MR imaging.
Viallon M; Terraz S; Roland J; Dumont E; Becker CD; Salomir R
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1491-506. PubMed ID: 20443470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Segmenting electroencephalography wires reduces radiofrequency shielding artifacts in simultaneous electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging at 7 T.
Lê TP; Gruetter R; Jorge J; Ipek Ö
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Sep; 88(3):1450-1464. PubMed ID: 35575944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro stent assessment by MRI: visibility of lumen and artifacts for 27 modern stents.
Heinrich A; Güttler FV; Schlesies F; Aschenbach R; Eckardt N; Teichgräber UK
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Nov; 62(6):565-573. PubMed ID: 27740912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Susceptibility-based MR Imaging of Nitinol Stent
Shi C; Wang H; Xie G; Su S; Huang Y; Chen H; Liu X; Zheng H; Liang D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5753-5756. PubMed ID: 31947159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT and MR imaging of nitinol stents with radiopaque distal markers.
Létourneau-Guillon L; Soulez G; Beaudoin G; Oliva VL; Giroux MF; Qin Z; Boussion N; Therasse E; De Guise J; Cloutier G
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Jun; 15(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 15178723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radio frequency versus susceptibility effects of small conductive implants--a systematic MRI study on aneurysm clips at 1.5 and 3 T.
Lauer UA; Graf H; Berger A; Claussen CD; Schick F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 15919602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [MRI of carotid stents: influence of stent properties and sequence parameters on visualization of the carotid artery lumen].
Straube T; Wolf S; Flesser A; Deli M; Alfke K; Nabavi A; Jansen O
Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 15719299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
