These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO. Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Circulatory Support with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and/or Impella for Cardiogenic Shock During Myocardial Infarction. Mourad M; Gaudard P; De La Arena P; Eliet J; Zeroual N; Rouvière P; Roubille F; Albat B; Colson PH ASAIO J; 2018; 64(6):708-714. PubMed ID: 29240628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction. Garan AR; Takeda K; Salna M; Vandenberge J; Doshi D; Karmpaliotis D; Kirtane AJ; Takayama H; Kurlansky P J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 May; 8(9):e012171. PubMed ID: 31041870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost savings for pVAD compared to ECMO in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An episode-of-care analysis. Vetrovec GW; Lim MJ; Needham KA Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Oct; 98(4):703-710. PubMed ID: 32790231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States. Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Choi KH; Yang JH; Park TK; Lee JM; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Ahn CM; Yu CW; Park IH; Jang WJ; Kim HJ; Bae JW; Kwon SU; Lee HJ; Lee WS; Jeong JO; Park SD; Kang TS; Gwon HC J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 May; 12(10):e029792. PubMed ID: 37158104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Left ventricular unloading via percutaneous assist device during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest. Kieserman JM; Kuznetsov IA; Park J; Schurr JW; Toubat O; Olia S; Bermudez C; Cevasco M; Wald J Int J Artif Organs; 2024 Jun; 47(6):401-410. PubMed ID: 38853663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample. Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Percutaneous Left Ventricular Decompression Therapy with Impella Is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock. Patel SM; Lipinski J; Al-Kindi SG; Patel T; Saric P; Li J; Nadeem F; Ladas T; Alaiti A; Phillips A; Medalion B; Deo S; Elgudin Y; Costa MA; Osman MN; Attizzani GF; Oliveira GH; Sareyyupoglu B; Bezerra HG ASAIO J; 2019 Jan; 65(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 29489461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impella versus Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Batchelor RJ; Wheelahan A; Zheng WC; Stub D; Yang Y; Chan W J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014. Vallabhajosyula S; Prasad A; Bell MR; Sandhu GS; Eleid MF; Dunlay SM; Schears GJ; Stulak JM; Singh M; Gersh BJ; Jaffe AS; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Barsness GW Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e005929. PubMed ID: 31826642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ten-year trends, predictors and outcomes of mechanical circulatory support in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Vallabhajosyula S; Prasad A; Sandhu GS; Bell MR; Gulati R; Eleid MF; Best PJM; Gersh BJ; Singh M; Lerman A; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Barsness GW; EuroIntervention; 2021 Feb; 16(15):e1254-e1261. PubMed ID: 31746759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization. Tarantini G; Masiero G; Burzotta F; Pazzanese V; Briguori C; Trani C; Piva T; De Marco F; Di Biasi M; Pagnotta P; Mojoli M; Casu G; Giustino G; Lorenzoni G; Montorfano M; Ancona MB; Pappalardo F; Chieffo A; Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 98(2):E222-E234. PubMed ID: 33793051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock. Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]