156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32606229)
1. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality.
Wenman A; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs.
Duggan L; Warren-Forward H; Smith T; Kron T
Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):232-7. PubMed ID: 12711642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Copper Filtration and kVp: Effect on Entrance Skin Exposure.
Barba J; Culp M
Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 26199432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing Contrast Resolution in Digital Chest Radiography by Varying Copper Filtration and kVp.
Balac V; Grossman R; Griswold R; Bowman D
Radiol Technol; 2023 Nov; 95(2):94-104. PubMed ID: 37940170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR.
Shanahan MC
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PATIENT DOSE ASSESSMENT AND OPTIMISATION OF PELVIC RADIOGRAPHY WITH COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
Abbeyquaye D; Inkoom S; Hammond NB; Fletcher JJ; Botwe BO
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Aug; 195(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 34320643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of MOSFET dosimeters for low-dose measurements in maxillofacial anthropomorphic phantoms.
Koivisto JH; Wolff JE; Kiljunen T; Schulze D; Kortesniemi M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):266–278. PubMed ID: 26219008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of added filtration on radiation dose and image quality in digital radiography of newborns.
Papadakis AE; Giannakaki V; Hatzidaki E; Damilakis J
Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Sep; 53(10):2060-2068. PubMed ID: 37310445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards in vivo TLD dosimetry in mammography.
Warren-Forward HM; Duggan L
Br J Radiol; 2004 May; 77(917):426-32. PubMed ID: 15121707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exposure and dose in panoramic radiology.
Goldstein A
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):1033-40. PubMed ID: 9650194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance?
Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Forner LA; Viccari C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 32845471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients.
Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hand-wrist, knee, and foot-ankle dosimetry and image quality measurements of a novel extremity imaging unit providing CBCT and 2D imaging options.
Ludlow JB
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4955-4963. PubMed ID: 30229941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
