These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Reducing effects of dispersal on the bias of 2-sample mark-recapture estimators of stream fish abundance. McNair JN; Ruetz CR; Carlson A; Suh J PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200733. PubMed ID: 30067773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the suitability of close-kin mark-recapture as a demographic modelling tool for a critically endangered elasmobranch population. Delaval A; Bendall V; Hetherington SJ; Skaug HJ; Frost M; Jones CS; Noble LR Evol Appl; 2023 Feb; 16(2):461-473. PubMed ID: 36793682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age is not just a number: How incorrect ageing impacts close-kin mark-recapture estimates of population size. Petersma FT; Thomas L; Harris D; Bradley D; Papastamatiou YP Ecol Evol; 2024 Jun; 14(6):e11352. PubMed ID: 38840589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Population abundance in arctic grayling using genetics and close-kin mark-recapture. Prystupa S; McCracken GR; Perry R; Ruzzante DE Ecol Evol; 2021 May; 11(9):4763-4773. PubMed ID: 33976846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simulation-based evaluation of methods for estimating census population size of terrestrial game species from genetically-identified parent-offspring pairs. Larroque J; Balkenhol N PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15151. PubMed ID: 37070094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low levels of sibship encourage use of larvae in western Atlantic bluefin tuna abundance estimation by close-kin mark-recapture. McDowell JR; Bravington M; Grewe PM; Lauretta M; Walter JF; Baylis SM; Gosselin T; Malca E; Gerard T; Shiroza A; Lamkin JT; Biesack EE; Zapfe G; Ingram W; Davies C; Porch C Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):18606. PubMed ID: 36329078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating animal abundance at multiple scales by spatially explicit capture-recapture. Howe EJ; Potter D; Beauclerc KB; Jackson KE; Northrup JM Ecol Appl; 2022 Oct; 32(7):e2638. PubMed ID: 35441452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of social organization, trap arrangement and density, sampling scale, and population density on bias in population size estimation using some common mark-recapture estimators. Gupta M; Joshi A; Vidya TN PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173609. PubMed ID: 28306735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears. Boulanger J; Kendall KC; Stetz JB; Roon DA; Waits LP; Paetkau D Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):577-89. PubMed ID: 18488618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient spatial multi-state capture-recapture model to study natal dispersal: An application to the Alpine marmot. Dupont P; Allainé D; Ferrandiz-Rovira M; Pradel R J Anim Ecol; 2022 Jan; 91(1):266-278. PubMed ID: 34743354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abundance estimation for line transect sampling: A comparison of distance sampling and spatial capture-recapture models. Crum NJ; Neyman LC; Gowan TA PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252231. PubMed ID: 34048456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]