These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities. Gerber BD; Parmenter RR Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Estimating dispersal using close kin dyads: The kindisperse R package. Jasper ME; Hoffmann AA; Schmidt TL Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Apr; 22(3):1200-1212. PubMed ID: 34597453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can we improve estimates of juvenile dispersal distance and survival? Cooper CB; Daniels SJ; Walters JR Ecology; 2008 Dec; 89(12):3349-61. PubMed ID: 19137942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dispersal inference from population genetic variation using a convolutional neural network. Smith CCR; Tittes S; Ralph PL; Kern AD Genetics; 2023 May; 224(2):. PubMed ID: 37052957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sampling designs matching species biology produce accurate and affordable abundance indices. Harris G; Farley S; Russell GJ; Butler MJ; Selinger J PeerJ; 2013; 1():e227. PubMed ID: 24392290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study. Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Incorporating capture heterogeneity in the estimation of autoregressive coefficients of animal population dynamics using capture-recapture data. Nicolau PG; Sørbye SH; Yoccoz NG Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):12710-12726. PubMed ID: 33304489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improving inference for aerial surveys of bears: The importance of assumptions and the cost of unnecessary complexity. Schmidt JH; Wilson TL; Thompson WL; Reynolds JH Ecol Evol; 2017 Jul; 7(13):4812-4821. PubMed ID: 28690810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of distance on detectability of Arctic waterfowl using double-observer sampling during helicopter surveys. Alisauskas RT; Conn PB Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(2):859-867. PubMed ID: 30766675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of current reproduction on apparent survival, breeding dispersal, and future reproduction in barn swallows assessed by multistate capture-recapture models. Schaub M; von Hirschheydt J J Anim Ecol; 2009 May; 78(3):625-35. PubMed ID: 19040683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Using spatial genetics to quantify mosquito dispersal for control programs. Filipović I; Hapuarachchi HC; Tien WP; Razak MABA; Lee C; Tan CH; Devine GJ; Rašić G BMC Biol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 32819378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimating multiple years, tributary-specific, and overall Atlantic salmon smolt abundance in a large Canadian catchment using capture-mark-recapture experiments. Dauphin GJR; Gillis CA; Chaput GJ J Fish Biol; 2024 Mar; 104(3):681-697. PubMed ID: 37837280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Linking Genetic Kinship and Demographic Analyses to Characterize Dispersal: Methods and Application to Blanding's Turtle. Reid BN; Thiel RP; Palsbøll PJ; Peery MZ J Hered; 2016; 107(7):603-614. PubMed ID: 27552818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models. Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88025. PubMed ID: 24505361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Including a spatial predictive process in band recovery models improves inference for Lincoln estimates of animal abundance. Gonnerman M; Linden DW; Shea SA; Sullivan K; Kamath P; Blomberg E Ecol Evol; 2022 Oct; 12(10):e9444. PubMed ID: 36311403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]