These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32607174)

  • 41. Validating camera trap distance sampling for chimpanzees.
    Cappelle N; Després-Einspenner ML; Howe EJ; Boesch C; Kühl HS
    Am J Primatol; 2019 Mar; 81(3):e22962. PubMed ID: 30811079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Including a spatial predictive process in band recovery models improves inference for Lincoln estimates of animal abundance.
    Gonnerman M; Linden DW; Shea SA; Sullivan K; Kamath P; Blomberg E
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Oct; 12(10):e9444. PubMed ID: 36311403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genetic spatial autocorrelation can readily detect sex-biased dispersal.
    Banks SC; Peakall R
    Mol Ecol; 2012 May; 21(9):2092-105. PubMed ID: 22335562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluating species richness: Biased ecological inference results from spatial heterogeneity in detection probabilities.
    McNew LB; Handel CM
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Sep; 25(6):1669-80. PubMed ID: 26552273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Integrated animal movement and spatial capture-recapture models: Simulation, implementation, and inference.
    Gardner B; McClintock BT; Converse SJ; Hostetter NJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3771. PubMed ID: 35638187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Joint estimation of survival and dispersal effectively corrects the permanent emigration bias in mark-recapture analyses.
    Badia-Boher JA; Real J; Riera JL; Bartumeus F; Parés F; Bas JM; Hernández-Matías A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6970. PubMed ID: 37117204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Estimating contemporary migration numbers of adults based on kinship relationships in iteroparous species.
    Akita T
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Nov; 22(8):3006-3017. PubMed ID: 35789097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models.
    Marrotte RR; Howe EJ; Beauclerc KB; Potter D; Northrup JM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13490. PubMed ID: 35694380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Spatially explicit capture recapture density estimates: Robustness, accuracy and precision in a long-term study of jaguars (Panthera onca).
    Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ; Quigley H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0227468. PubMed ID: 32511240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Temporal and geographic patterns of kinship structure in common dolphins (
    Ball L; Shreves K; Pilot M; Moura AE
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2017; 71(8):123. PubMed ID: 28794579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A spatial open-population capture-recapture model.
    Efford MG; Schofield MR
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 31517386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accounting for imperfect detection of groups and individuals when estimating abundance.
    Clement MJ; Converse SJ; Royle JA
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(18):7304-7310. PubMed ID: 28944018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A new mark-recapture approach for abundance estimation of social species.
    Hickey JR; Sollmann R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208726. PubMed ID: 30571710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mark-recapture and mark-resight methods for estimating abundance with remote cameras: a carnivore case study.
    Alonso RS; McClintock BT; Lyren LM; Boydston EE; Crooks KR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123032. PubMed ID: 25822245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Estimating abundance using mark-resight when sampling is with replacement or the number of marked individuals is unknown.
    McClintock BT; White GC; Antolin MF; Tripp DW
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 18479484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability.
    Ruprecht JS; Eriksson CE; Forrester TD; Clark DA; Wisdom MJ; Rowland MM; Johnson BK; Levi T
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02405. PubMed ID: 34245619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Advances in wildlife abundance estimation using pedigree reconstruction.
    Rosenblatt E; Creel S; Gieder K; Murdoch J; Donovan T
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e10650. PubMed ID: 37869434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A new approach to the "apparent survival" problem: estimating true survival rates from mark-recapture studies.
    Gilroy JJ; Virzi T; Boulton RL; Lockwood JL
    Ecology; 2012 Jul; 93(7):1509-16. PubMed ID: 22919897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density.
    Després-Einspenner ML; Howe EJ; Drapeau P; Kühl HS
    Am J Primatol; 2017 Jul; 79(7):. PubMed ID: 28267880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Estimating the abundance of mouse populations of known size: promises and pitfalls of new methods.
    Conn PB; Arthur AD; Bailey LL; Singleton GR
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Apr; 16(2):829-37. PubMed ID: 16711066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.