BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3260719)

  • 1. Use of low-osmolality contrast media in a price-sensitive environment.
    Steinberg EP; Anderson GF; Powe NR; Sakin JW; Kinnison ML; Neuman P; White RI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 3260719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Significance of low osmolarity contrast media in state of the art roentgen diagnosis].
    Pokorny L; Kiss I; Karcsú S; Nehéz I; Feledi J; Vadon G
    Orv Hetil; 1989 Jun; 130(25):1317-21. PubMed ID: 2664636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
    Caro JJ; Trindade E; McGregor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High and low osmolar contrast media: who pays?
    Göthlin JH
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 May; 8(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 3383859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-osmolality contrast media: good news or bad?
    Evens RG
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):277-8. PubMed ID: 3138706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An institutional approach to developing guidelines for the use of low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Swanson DP
    Appl Radiol; 1988 May; 17(5):27-8. PubMed ID: 10287384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Steinberg EP; Moore RD; Powe NR; Gopalan R; Davidoff AJ; Litt M; Graziano S; Brinker JA
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast medium-induced adverse reactions: economic outcome.
    Powe NR; Steinberg EP; Erickson JE; Moore RD; Smith CR; White RI; Brinker JA; Fishman EK; Zinreich SJ; Kinnison ML
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 3420254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic impact of low-osmolality contrast agents on radiology procedures and departments.
    Evens RG
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):267-8. PubMed ID: 3786775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delayed vs. immediate adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast media.
    Oi H; Yamazaki H; Matsushita M
    Radiat Med; 1997; 15(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9134581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of patient responses to high- and low-osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously.
    Bagg MN; Horwitz TA; Bester L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):185-7. PubMed ID: 3487214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Swanson DP; Thrall JH; Shetty PC
    Clin Pharm; 1986 Nov; 5(11):877-91. PubMed ID: 3780159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes & choices. AR nationwide survey.
    Tsuchiyama S
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Nov; 7(11):70-4, 76-8. PubMed ID: 10291083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indications for the use of low-osmolar contrast agents.
    Bloom DM
    Physician Exec; 1989; 15(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 10313370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New contrast media.
    Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1987 Apr; 29(738):43-4. PubMed ID: 3574237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Net costs from three perspectives of using low versus high osmolality contrast medium in diagnostic angiocardiography.
    Powe NR; Davidoff AJ; Moore RD; Brinker JA; Anderson GF; Litt MR; Gopalan R; Graziano SL; Steinberg EP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 21(7):1701-9. PubMed ID: 8496540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assessment and improvement: what radiologists do and think.
    Deitch CH; Chan WC; Sunshine JH; Zinninger MD; Cascade PN; Cochran ST
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1245-54. PubMed ID: 7976910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages of a low-osmolality ionic contrast medium in intra-arterial applications.
    Miller K
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 59(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 3659338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonionic contrast media: economic analysis and health policy development.
    Goel V; Deber RB; Detsky AS
    CMAJ; 1989 Feb; 140(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 2492446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.