These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3260719)

  • 1. Use of low-osmolality contrast media in a price-sensitive environment.
    Steinberg EP; Anderson GF; Powe NR; Sakin JW; Kinnison ML; Neuman P; White RI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 3260719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Significance of low osmolarity contrast media in state of the art roentgen diagnosis].
    Pokorny L; Kiss I; Karcsú S; Nehéz I; Feledi J; Vadon G
    Orv Hetil; 1989 Jun; 130(25):1317-21. PubMed ID: 2664636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
    Caro JJ; Trindade E; McGregor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High and low osmolar contrast media: who pays?
    Göthlin JH
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 May; 8(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 3383859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-osmolality contrast media: good news or bad?
    Evens RG
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):277-8. PubMed ID: 3138706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An institutional approach to developing guidelines for the use of low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Swanson DP
    Appl Radiol; 1988 May; 17(5):27-8. PubMed ID: 10287384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Steinberg EP; Moore RD; Powe NR; Gopalan R; Davidoff AJ; Litt M; Graziano S; Brinker JA
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast medium-induced adverse reactions: economic outcome.
    Powe NR; Steinberg EP; Erickson JE; Moore RD; Smith CR; White RI; Brinker JA; Fishman EK; Zinreich SJ; Kinnison ML
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 3420254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic impact of low-osmolality contrast agents on radiology procedures and departments.
    Evens RG
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):267-8. PubMed ID: 3786775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delayed vs. immediate adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast media.
    Oi H; Yamazaki H; Matsushita M
    Radiat Med; 1997; 15(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9134581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of patient responses to high- and low-osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously.
    Bagg MN; Horwitz TA; Bester L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):185-7. PubMed ID: 3487214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Swanson DP; Thrall JH; Shetty PC
    Clin Pharm; 1986 Nov; 5(11):877-91. PubMed ID: 3780159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes & choices. AR nationwide survey.
    Tsuchiyama S
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Nov; 7(11):70-4, 76-8. PubMed ID: 10291083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indications for the use of low-osmolar contrast agents.
    Bloom DM
    Physician Exec; 1989; 15(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 10313370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New contrast media.
    Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1987 Apr; 29(738):43-4. PubMed ID: 3574237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Net costs from three perspectives of using low versus high osmolality contrast medium in diagnostic angiocardiography.
    Powe NR; Davidoff AJ; Moore RD; Brinker JA; Anderson GF; Litt MR; Gopalan R; Graziano SL; Steinberg EP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 21(7):1701-9. PubMed ID: 8496540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assessment and improvement: what radiologists do and think.
    Deitch CH; Chan WC; Sunshine JH; Zinninger MD; Cascade PN; Cochran ST
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1245-54. PubMed ID: 7976910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages of a low-osmolality ionic contrast medium in intra-arterial applications.
    Miller K
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 59(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 3659338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonionic contrast media: economic analysis and health policy development.
    Goel V; Deber RB; Detsky AS
    CMAJ; 1989 Feb; 140(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 2492446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.