These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Reduced use of lower-osmolality contrast media resulting from an order form and guidelines. Swanson DP; Damiani-Hieronim DR; Baron RL Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Dec; 51(23):2952-5. PubMed ID: 7879806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Low osmolality contrast media in peripheral arteriography--clinical comparison of ioxaglate, iopamidol, iohexol and diatrizoate]. Tajima H Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov; 45(11):1407-20. PubMed ID: 4094879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Calculation of internal costs in a department of diagnostic radiology. Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Uhde A; Aslaksen A Eur J Radiol; 1988 Aug; 8(3):181-2. PubMed ID: 3139411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Current use of low-osmolality contrast agents: results of a survey. Bettmann MA; Geller SC; McClennan B; Dunnick NR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):1079-83. PubMed ID: 2801427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization. Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adverse reactions to contrast media: factors that determine the cost of treatment. Powe NR; Moore RD; Steinberg EP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):1089-95. PubMed ID: 8273616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Decision analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of low-osmolality contrast medium for intravenous urography. Calvo MV; Pilar del Val M; Mar Alvarez M; Domínguez-Gil A Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 Mar; 49(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 1598930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CT. Megibow AJ; Jacob G; Heiken JP; Paulson EK; Hopper KD; Sica G; Saini S; Birnbaum BA; Redvanley R; Fishman EK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):583-9. PubMed ID: 11222185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Survey of contrast media use in southeastern U.S. hospitals. Utter DP Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 9170181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Informed consent for interventional radiology procedures: a survey detailing current European practice. O'Dwyer HM; Lyon SM; Fotheringham T; Lee MJ Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2003; 26(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 14753299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Informed consent for intravenous contrast-enhanced radiography: a national survey of practice and opinion. Spring DB; Akin JR; Margulis AR Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 6463241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. New dyes' higher costs cause controversy. Wagner M Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(3):45. PubMed ID: 10291656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of low-osmolality contrast media on red cell filterability. Imai H; Hiruma H; Kumazaki T; Uyesaka N Acta Radiol; 1993 May; 34(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 8489832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]