These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3260731)

  • 1. High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces.
    Shellock FG; Crues JV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 3260731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a compilation of the literature.
    Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):811-4. PubMed ID: 3048071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: an updated review.
    Shellock FG; Curtis JS
    Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 2068325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 update.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli S; Kanal E
    Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):587-99. PubMed ID: 8210394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
    New PF; Rosen BR; Brady TJ; Buonanno FS; Kistler JP; Burt CT; Hinshaw WS; Newhouse JH; Pohost GM; Taveras JM
    Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 6828719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system].
    Sommer T; Maintz D; Schmiedel A; Hackenbroch M; Hofer U; Urbach H; Pavlidis C; Träber F; Schild H; Höher M
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):731-8. PubMed ID: 15122473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards.
    Pruefer D; Kalden P; Schreiber W; Dahm M; Buerke M; Thelen M; Oelert H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 11380110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):721-32. PubMed ID: 12451586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR imaging and metallic implants for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of ferromagnetism and artifact.
    Shellock FG; Mink JH; Curtin S; Friedman MJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 1562775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aneurysm clip testing for ferromagnetic properties: clip variability issues.
    Kanal E; Shellock FG; Lewin JS
    Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):576-8. PubMed ID: 8685361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [In-vitro-study and patient examinations with MRT: the significance of metal implants].
    Grebmeier J; Weikl A; Glückert K; Hofmann-Preiss K; Huk WJ; Roedl W; Wolf F
    Rofo; 1991 May; 154(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 1852036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR imaging in patients with metallic implants.
    Laakman RW; Kaufman B; Han JS; Nelson AD; Clampitt M; O'Block AM; Haaga JR; Alfidi RJ
    Radiology; 1985 Dec; 157(3):711-4. PubMed ID: 4059558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Injuries associated with MR imaging: survey of safety records and methods used to screen patients for metallic foreign bodies before imaging.
    Boutin RD; Briggs JE; Williamson MR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 8273663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Important considerations in measurement of attractive force on metallic implants in MR imagers.
    Kagetsu NJ; Litt AW
    Radiology; 1991 May; 179(2):505-8. PubMed ID: 2014301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metallic otologic implants: in vitro assessment of ferromagnetism at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Schatz CJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 1902028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism and artifacts of cardiac occluders exposed to a 1.5-T MR system.
    Shellock FG; Morisoli SM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 8180463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Translational and rotational forces on heart valve prostheses subjected ex vivo to a 4.7-T MR system.
    Edwards MB; Ordidge RJ; Thomas DL; Hand JW; Taylor KM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):653-9. PubMed ID: 12451578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters.
    Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Sep; 14(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11536406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ferromagnetic materials in patients: detection before MR imaging.
    Finn EJ; Di Chiro G; Brooks RA; Sato S
    Radiology; 1985 Jul; 156(1):139-41. PubMed ID: 4001400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.