These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32608178)

  • 1. Breast cancer survivors' risk of interval cancers and false positive results in organized mammography screening.
    Njor SH; Vejborg I; Larsen MB
    Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):6042-6050. PubMed ID: 32608178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.
    Bakker MF; de Lange SV; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Peeters PHM; Monninkhof EM; Emaus MJ; Loo CE; Bisschops RHC; Lobbes MBI; de Jong MDF; Duvivier KM; Veltman J; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van Diest PJ; Mali WPTM; van den Bosch MAAJ; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH;
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Nov; 381(22):2091-2102. PubMed ID: 31774954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and radiological features of breast tumors according to history of false-positive results in mammography screening.
    Domingo L; Romero A; Blanch J; Salas D; Sánchez M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Ferrer J; Ibáñez J; Vega A; Laso MS; Castells X; Sala M
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 23962702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer.
    McCann J; Stockton D; Godward S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2002; 4(5):R11. PubMed ID: 12223128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of breast cancer after false-positive test results in screening mammography.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Risør LM; Thorsted BL; Vejborg I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 May; 104(9):682-9. PubMed ID: 22491228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 33350890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening mammography for second breast cancers in women with history of early-stage breast cancer: factors and causes associated with non-detection.
    Yeom YK; Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Jan; 19(1):2. PubMed ID: 30611228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Histopathologic Tumor Characteristics after False-Positive Findings at Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program.
    Hofvind S; Sagstad S; Sebuødegård S; Chen Y; Roman M; Lee CI
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 29239711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features.
    Castells X; Torá-Rocamora I; Posso M; Román M; Vernet-Tomas M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Domingo L; Vidal C; Baré M; Ferrer J; Quintana MJ; Sánchez M; Natal C; Espinàs JA; Saladié F; Sala M;
    Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 26878225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
    Houssami N; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study.
    Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implications of false-positive results for future cancer screenings.
    Taksler GB; Keating NL; Rothberg MB
    Cancer; 2018 Jun; 124(11):2390-2398. PubMed ID: 29682740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased risk of breast cancer in women with false-positive test: the role of misclassification.
    von Euler-Chelpin M; Kuchiki M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 38(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 25035157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mammography screening in the county of Copenhagen. Results of the first three screening rounds].
    Tange UB; Hirsch FR; Jensen MB; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Vejborg IM; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1048-52. PubMed ID: 11894707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancer after false-positive results at mammography screening: joint analysis of three national cohorts.
    Román M; Hofvind S; von Euler-Chelpin M; Castells X
    Br J Cancer; 2019 Jan; 120(2):269-275. PubMed ID: 30563993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation.
    Bennett ML; Welman CJ; Celliers LM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):928-39. PubMed ID: 21718976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consensus review of discordant findings maximizes cancer detection rate in double-reader screening mammography: Irish National Breast Screening Program experience.
    Shaw CM; Flanagan FL; Fenlon HM; McNicholas MM
    Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):354-62. PubMed ID: 19188311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.