These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32608303)

  • 21. Are rating scales really better than checklists for measuring increasing levels of expertise?
    Wood TJ; Pugh D
    Med Teach; 2020 Jan; 42(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 31429366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Standard setting in OSCEs: a borderline approach.
    Rajiah K; Veettil SK; Kumar S
    Clin Teach; 2014 Dec; 11(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 25417986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Medical students review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings.
    Bernard AW; Ceccolini G; Feinn R; Rockfeld J; Rosenberg I; Thomas L; Cassese T
    Med Educ Online; 2017; 22(1):1324718. PubMed ID: 28521646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The show must go on? Patients, props and pedagogy in the theatre of the OSCE.
    Gormley GJ; Hodges BD; McNaughton N; Johnston JL
    Med Educ; 2016 Dec; 50(12):1237-1240. PubMed ID: 27873404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analytic global OSCE ratings are sensitive to level of training.
    Hodges B; McIlroy JH
    Med Educ; 2003 Nov; 37(11):1012-6. PubMed ID: 14629415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Remote and onsite scoring of OSCEs using generalisability theory: A three-year cohort study.
    Chen TC; Lin MC; Chiang YC; Monrouxe L; Chien SJ
    Med Teach; 2019 May; 41(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 30457405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Setting defensible standards in small cohort OSCEs: Understanding better when borderline regression can 'work'.
    Homer M; Fuller R; Hallam J; Pell G
    Med Teach; 2020 Mar; 42(3):306-315. PubMed ID: 31657266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. True communication skills assessment in interdepartmental OSCE stations: Standard setting using the MAAS-Global and EduG.
    Setyonugroho W; Kropmans T; Murphy R; Hayes P; van Dalen J; Kennedy KM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Jan; 101(1):147-151. PubMed ID: 28838631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The GRACE checklist for rating the quality of observational studies of comparative effectiveness: a tale of hope and caution.
    Dreyer NA; Velentgas P; Westrich K; Dubois R
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2014 Mar; 20(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 24564810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimizing the utility of communication OSCEs: omit station-specific checklists and provide students with narrative feedback.
    Van Nuland M; Van den Noortgate W; van der Vleuten C; Jo G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jul; 88(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 22322068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of alternative item weighting strategies on the data gathering component of a clinical skills performance assessment.
    Kahraman N; Clauser BE; Margolis MJ
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S72-5. PubMed ID: 18820506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Revisited.
    Gupta P; Dewan P; Singh T
    Indian Pediatr; 2010 Nov; 47(11):911-20. PubMed ID: 21149898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simulation as a high stakes assessment tool in emergency medicine.
    O'Leary F
    Emerg Med Australas; 2015 Apr; 27(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 25690440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Progress testing: is there a role for the OSCE?
    Pugh D; Touchie C; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 48(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 24807438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Summative Assessment of Interprofessional "Collaborative Practice" Skills in Graduating Medical Students: A Validity Argument.
    Fraser KL; Charania I; Hecker KG; Donahue M; Kaba A; Veale P; Coderre S; McLaughlin K
    Acad Med; 2020 Nov; 95(11):1763-1769. PubMed ID: 31977343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Applying Kane's validity framework to a simulation based assessment of clinical competence.
    Tavares W; Brydges R; Myre P; Prpic J; Turner L; Yelle R; Huiskamp M
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 May; 23(2):323-338. PubMed ID: 29079933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An objective structured clinical exam to measure intrinsic CanMEDS roles.
    Kassam A; Cowan M; Donnon T
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():31085. PubMed ID: 27637267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What works best in a general practice specific OSCE for medical students: Mini-CEX or content-related checklists?
    Giemsa P; Wübbolding C; Fischer MR; Graupe T; Härtl A; Lenz C; Sanftenberg L; Schelling J; Schüttpelz-Brauns K; Kiessling C
    Med Teach; 2020 May; 42(5):578-584. PubMed ID: 32024438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cheating in OSCEs: The Impact of Simulated Security Breaches on OSCE Performance.
    Gotzmann A; De Champlain A; Homayra F; Fotheringham A; de Vries I; Forgie M; Pugh D
    Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 27603790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Standard Setting Methods for Pass/Fail Decisions on High-Stakes Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Validity Study.
    Yousuf N; Violato C; Zuberi RW
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 26158330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.