139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32608581)
1. Application of 3D-FS-SPGR imaging combined synovial fluid GGCX detection in the evaluation of knee osteoarthritis.
Yang L; Niu D; Bai Z; Ma J; Sun X; Liang Y; Zhang J
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2020 Jun; 29(6):701-706. PubMed ID: 32608581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The value of 3 dimensional-fat suppression-spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition sequence on single compartment osteoarthritis for unicompartmental arthroplasty preoperative assessment].
Zhao G; Liu Y; Qu F; Yuan B; Wang J; Shen X; Li H; Lu X; Guo Q; Qi W; Liu Y; Zhu J
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 53(7):528-32. PubMed ID: 26359077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.
Yoshioka H; Alley M; Steines D; Stevens K; Rubesova E; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12815641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.
Cha JG; Yoo JH; Rhee SJ; Hwang SS; Han JK
Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15068938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging with an SPGR sequence for the early evaluation of knee cartilage degeneration and the relationship between cartilage and other tissues.
Yang X; Li Z; Cao Y; Xu Y; Wang H; Wen L; Meng Z; Liu H; Wang R; Li X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 May; 14(1):152. PubMed ID: 31126302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.
Vasnawala SS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Gold GE
Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new non-invasive method to assess synovitis severity in relation to symptoms and cartilage volume loss in knee osteoarthritis patients using MRI.
Pelletier JP; Raynauld JP; Abram F; Haraoui B; Choquette D; Martel-Pelletier J
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2008; 16 Suppl 3():S8-13. PubMed ID: 18672386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fractions on Cartilage Regeneration Was Quantitatively Evaluated Based on the 3D-FS-SPGR Sequence: A Clinical Trial Study.
Zhang Y; Bi Q; Luo J; Tong Y; Yu T; Zhang Q
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():2777568. PubMed ID: 35118156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo imaging: a modified FS 3D SPGR technique for assessment of patellofemoral joint chondromalacia.
Wang SF; Cheng HC; Chang CY
Clin Imaging; 1999; 23(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 10506912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging.
Ba-Ssalamah A; Schibany N; Puig S; Herneth AM; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Trattnig S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging articular cartilage defects with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence and correlation with histology.
Trattnig S; Huber M; Breitenseher MJ; Trnka HJ; Rand T; Kaider A; Helbich T; Imhof H; Resnick D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 9448754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences.
Kornaat PR; Reeder SB; Koo S; Brittain JH; Yu H; Andriacchi TP; Gold GE
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Apr; 13(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 15780647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
