These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Entomopathogenic potential of Metarhizium anisopliae isolated from engorged females and tested in eggs and larvae of Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Fernandes EK; da Costa GL; de Moraes AM; Bittencourt VR J Basic Microbiol; 2004; 44(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 15266598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does the effect of a Metarhizium anisopliae isolate on Rhipicephalus microplus depend on the tick population evaluated? Webster A; Pradel E; Souza UA; Martins JR; Reck J; Schrank A; Klafke G Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2017 Feb; 8(2):270-274. PubMed ID: 27908773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of passages through a suitable host of the fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae, on the virulence of acaricide-susceptible and resistant strains of the tick, Rhipicephalus microplus. Adames M; Fernández-Ruvalcaba M; Peña-Chora G; Hernández-Velázquez VM J Insect Sci; 2011; 11(1):21. PubMed ID: 26983168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pen studies on the control of cattle tick (Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus) with Metarhizium anisopliae (Sorokin). Leemon DM; Turner LB; Jonsson NN Vet Parasitol; 2008 Oct; 156(3-4):248-60. PubMed ID: 18639382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of Metarhizium anisopliae fungus on off-host Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from tick-infested pasture under cattle grazing in Brazil. Garcia MV; Monteiro AC; Szabó MP; Mochi DA; Simi LD; Carvalho WM; Tsuruta SA; Barbosa JC Vet Parasitol; 2011 Sep; 181(2-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 21571437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microsclerotial pellets of Metarhizium spp.: thermotolerance and bioefficacy against the cattle tick. da Paixão FRS; Muniz ER; Catão AML; Santos TR; Luz C; Marreto RN; Mascarin GM; Fernandes ÉKK Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2023 Apr; 107(7-8):2263-2275. PubMed ID: 36929189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of entomopathogenic native fungi from paddock soils against Rhipicephalus microplus larvae with different toxicological behaviors to acaricides. Fernández-Salas A; Alonso-Díaz MA; Alonso-Morales RA Exp Parasitol; 2019 Sep; 204():107729. PubMed ID: 31348914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of water- and oil-in-water-formulated Metarhizium anisopliae in Rhipicephalus sanguineus eggs and eclosing larvae. Luz C; D'Alessandro WB; Rodrigues J; Fernandes ÉK Parasitol Res; 2016 Jan; 115(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 26364059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of conidial Pr1 protease on pathogenicity potential of Metarhizium anisopliae senso latu to ticks. Golo PS; Santos HA; Perinotto WM; Quinelato S; Angelo IC; Camargo MG; Sá FA; Massard CL; Fernandes ÉK; Roberts DW; Bittencourt VR Parasitol Res; 2015 Jun; 114(6):2309-15. PubMed ID: 25786608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [In vitro patogenicity of the fungi Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff, 1879) Sorokin, 1883, on the tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini,1887)]. de Melo DR; Reis RC; Bittencourt VR Rev Bras Parasitol Vet; 2006; 15(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 17196119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pathogenicity of Metarhizium anisopliae (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) to tick eggs and the effect of egg cuticular lipids on conidia development. Gindin G; Ment D; Rot A; Glazer I; Samish M J Med Entomol; 2009 May; 46(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 19496424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Protection of Metarhizium anisopliae conidia from ultra-violet radiation and their pathogenicity to Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi ticks. Hedimbi M; Kaaya GP; Singh S; Chimwamurombe PM; Gindin G; Glazer I; Samish M Exp Appl Acarol; 2008 Dec; 46(1-4):149-56. PubMed ID: 18712608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Virulence of Mexican isolates of entomopathogenic fungi (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) upon Rhipicephalus=Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) larvae and the efficacy of conidia formulations to reduce larval tick density under field conditions. Angel-Sahagún CA; Lezama-Gutiérrez R; Molina-Ochoa J; Pescador-Rubio A; Skoda SR; Cruz-Vázquez C; Lorenzoni AG; Galindo-Velasco E; Fragoso-Sánchez H; Foster JE Vet Parasitol; 2010 Jun; 170(3-4):278-86. PubMed ID: 20359827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Encapsulation of entomopathogenic fungal conidia: evaluation of stability and control potential of Rhipicephalus microplus. Meirelles LN; Mesquita E; Corrêa TA; Bitencourt ROB; Oliveira JL; Fraceto LF; Camargo MG; Bittencourt VREP Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2023 Jul; 14(4):102184. PubMed ID: 37105010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative studies on the invasion of cattle ticks (Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus) and sheep blowflies (Lucilia cuprina) by Metarhizium anisopliae (Sorokin). Leemon DM; Jonsson NN J Invertebr Pathol; 2012 Feb; 109(2):248-59. PubMed ID: 22178573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Control of tick populations by spraying Metarhizium anisopliae conidia on cattle under field conditions. Kaaya GP; Samish M; Hedimbi M; Gindin G; Glazer I Exp Appl Acarol; 2011 Nov; 55(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 21725837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Updating the application of Metarhizium anisopliae to control cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Beys-da-Silva WO; Rosa RL; Berger M; Coutinho-Rodrigues CJB; Vainstein MH; Schrank A; Bittencourt VREP; Santi L Exp Parasitol; 2020 Jan; 208():107812. PubMed ID: 31809704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]