158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32609776)
1. A comparison of Monte Carlo sampling methods for metabolic network models.
Fallahi S; Skaug HJ; Alendal G
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235393. PubMed ID: 32609776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CHRR: coordinate hit-and-run with rounding for uniform sampling of constraint-based models.
Haraldsdóttir HS; Cousins B; Thiele I; Fleming RMT; Vempala S
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jun; 33(11):1741-1743. PubMed ID: 28158334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uniform sampling of steady states in metabolic networks: heterogeneous scales and rounding.
De Martino D; Mori M; Parisi V
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122670. PubMed ID: 25849140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Practical sampling of constraint-based models: Optimized thinning boosts CHRR performance.
Jadebeck JF; Wiechert W; Nöh K
PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Aug; 19(8):e1011378. PubMed ID: 37566638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo sampling can be used to determine the size and shape of the steady-state flux space.
Wiback SJ; Famili I; Greenberg HJ; Palsson BØ
J Theor Biol; 2004 Jun; 228(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 15178193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flux sampling is a powerful tool to study metabolism under changing environmental conditions.
Herrmann HA; Dyson BC; Vass L; Johnson GN; Schwartz JM
NPJ Syst Biol Appl; 2019; 5():32. PubMed ID: 31482008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstructions to Sampling Qualitative Properties.
Reimers AC
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135636. PubMed ID: 26287384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting outcomes of steady-state ¹³C isotope tracing experiments using Monte Carlo sampling.
Schellenberger J; Zielinski DC; Choi W; Madireddi S; Portnoy V; Scott DA; Reed JL; Osterman AL; Palsson B
BMC Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 6():9. PubMed ID: 22289253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the size of the solution space of metabolic networks.
Braunstein A; Mulet R; Pagnani A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9():240. PubMed ID: 18489757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. LooplessFluxSampler: an efficient toolbox for sampling the loopless flux solution space of metabolic models.
Saa PA; Zapararte S; Drovandi CC; Nielsen LK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):3. PubMed ID: 38166586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjusting for false discoveries in constraint-based differential metabolic flux analysis.
Galuzzi BG; Milazzo L; Damiani C
J Biomed Inform; 2024 Feb; 150():104597. PubMed ID: 38272432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. optGpSampler: an improved tool for uniformly sampling the solution-space of genome-scale metabolic networks.
Megchelenbrink W; Huynen M; Marchiori E
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e86587. PubMed ID: 24551039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uniform sampling of steady-state flux spaces: means to design experiments and to interpret enzymopathies.
Price ND; Schellenberger J; Palsson BO
Biophys J; 2004 Oct; 87(4):2172-86. PubMed ID: 15454420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of randomized sampling for analysis of metabolic networks.
Schellenberger J; Palsson BØ
J Biol Chem; 2009 Feb; 284(9):5457-61. PubMed ID: 18940807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elimination of thermodynamically infeasible loops in steady-state metabolic models.
Schellenberger J; Lewis NE; Palsson BØ
Biophys J; 2011 Feb; 100(3):544-553. PubMed ID: 21281568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A hybrid model of anaerobic E. coli GJT001: combination of elementary flux modes and cybernetic variables.
Kim JI; Varner JD; Ramkrishna D
Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(5):993-1006. PubMed ID: 19194908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithm based metabolic flux distribution analysis on Corynebacterium glutamicum.
Kadirkamanathan V; Yang J; Billings SA; Wright PC
Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 22(21):2681-7. PubMed ID: 16940326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An analytic approximation of the feasible space of metabolic networks.
Braunstein A; Muntoni AP; Pagnani A
Nat Commun; 2017 Apr; 8():14915. PubMed ID: 28382977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generic flux coupling analysis.
Reimers AC; Goldstein Y; Bockmayr A
Math Biosci; 2015 Apr; 262():28-35. PubMed ID: 25619608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sampling with poling-based flux balance analysis: optimal versus sub-optimal flux space analysis of Actinobacillus succinogenes.
Binns M; de Atauri P; Vlysidis A; Cascante M; Theodoropoulos C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():49. PubMed ID: 25887116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
