These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32610026)

  • 1. The Influence of Hearing Loss on Cognitive Control in an Auditory Conflict Task: Behavioral and Pupillometry Findings.
    Zekveld AA; van Scheepen JAM; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE; van Steenbergen H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2483-2492. PubMed ID: 32610026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.
    Hershman R; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts.
    Hershman R; Henik A
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):325-333. PubMed ID: 31396822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transition from reactive control to proactive control across conflict adaptation: An sLORETA study.
    Suzuki K; Shinoda H
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Nov; 100():7-14. PubMed ID: 26432378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Please try harder! The influence of hearing status and evaluative feedback during listening on the pupil dilation response, saliva-cortisol and saliva alpha-amylase levels.
    Zekveld AA; van Scheepen JAM; Versfeld NJ; Veerman ECI; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107768. PubMed ID: 31387070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Task-Evoked Pupil Response in Divided Auditory Attention Tasks.
    Baldock J; Kapadia S; van Steenbrugge W
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Apr; 30(4):264-272. PubMed ID: 30461386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A closer look at cognitive control: differences in resource allocation during updating, inhibition and switching as revealed by pupillometry.
    Rondeel EW; van Steenbergen H; Holland RW; van Knippenberg A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():494. PubMed ID: 26441594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When conflict influences liking: The case of the Stroop task.
    Damen TGE; Strick M; Taris TW; Aarts H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199700. PubMed ID: 29995919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of meaning to the detection of task conflict.
    Hershman R; Levin Y; Tzelgov J; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Sep; 74(9):1553-1561. PubMed ID: 33629642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neutral stimuli and pupillometric task conflict.
    Hershman R; Levin Y; Tzelgov J; Henik A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1084-1092. PubMed ID: 32170401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of reward and task demand in value-based strategic allocation of auditory comprehension effort.
    Zhang M; Siegle GJ; McNeil MR; Pratt SR; Palmer C
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107775. PubMed ID: 31401432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26272367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurocognitive mechanisms of affective conflict adaptation: An event related fMRI study.
    Kar BR; Nigam R; Pammi VSC; Guleria A; Srinivasan N
    Prog Brain Res; 2019; 247():149-167. PubMed ID: 31196432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task and information conflicts in the numerical Stroop task.
    Hershman R; Beckmann L; Henik A
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Sep; 59(9):e14057. PubMed ID: 35353908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the stroop effect.
    Henkin Y; Yaar-Soffer Y; Gilat S; Muchnik C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):474-86. PubMed ID: 20807483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linking tonic and phasic pupil responses to P300 amplitude in an emotional face-word Stroop task.
    Chang YH; Chen HJ; Barquero C; Tsai HJ; Liang WK; Hsu CH; Muggleton NG; Wang CA
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Apr; 61(4):e14479. PubMed ID: 37920144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.
    Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):663-70. PubMed ID: 19071142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.