These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32610699)

  • 1. Optimization of a Portable Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminescence Assay Coupled with a Receiver Operating Characteristic Model to Assess Bioaerosol Concentrations on Site.
    Tseng CC; Lu YC; Chang KC; Hung CC
    Microorganisms; 2020 Jun; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 32610699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring by combined aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence assay.
    Park JW; Kim HR; Hwang J
    Anal Chim Acta; 2016 Oct; 941():101-107. PubMed ID: 27692374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fast monitoring of indoor bioaerosol concentrations with ATP bioluminescence assay using an electrostatic rod-type sampler.
    Park JW; Park CW; Lee SH; Hwang J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125251. PubMed ID: 25950929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Online monitoring system for qualitative and quantitative analysis of bioaerosols by combined ATP bioluminescence assay with loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
    Chen Z; Liang Z; Li G; Das R; Chen P; An T
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Aug; 937():173404. PubMed ID: 38797419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field Performance of a Novel Passive Bioaerosol Sampler using Polarized Ferroelectric Polymer Films.
    Therkorn J; Thomas N; Scheinbeim J; Mainelis G
    Aerosol Sci Technol; 2017; 51(7):787-800. PubMed ID: 30774180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a size-selective sampler combined with an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for the rapid measurement of bioaerosols.
    Liao L; Byeon JH; Park JH
    Environ Res; 2021 Mar; 194():110615. PubMed ID: 33309960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A high-flow portable biological aerosol trap (HighBioTrap) for rapid microbial detection.
    Chen H; Yao M
    J Aerosol Sci; 2018 Mar; 117():212-223. PubMed ID: 32372770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collection efficiencies of an electrostatic sampler with superhydrophobic surface for fungal bioaerosols.
    Han T; Nazarenko Y; Lioy PJ; Mainelis G
    Indoor Air; 2011 Apr; 21(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 21204982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling efficiency and nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling with different bioaerosol samplers.
    Bøifot KO; Skogan G; Dybwad M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 May; 196(6):577. PubMed ID: 38795190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field evaluation of personal sampling methods for multiple bioaerosols.
    Wang CH; Chen BT; Han BC; Liu AC; Hung PC; Chen CY; Chao HJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120308. PubMed ID: 25799419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous Surveillance of Bioaerosols On-Site Using an Automated Bioaerosol-Monitoring System.
    Cho YS; Kim HR; Ko HS; Jeong SB; Chan Kim B; Jung JH
    ACS Sens; 2020 Feb; 5(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 31913022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of airborne microbial communities using 16S ribosomal RNA: Potential bias due to air sampling stress.
    Zhen H; Krumins V; Fennell DE; Mainelis G
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 621():939-947. PubMed ID: 29079080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and laboratory evaluation of a compact swirling aerosol sampler (SAS) for collection of atmospheric bioaerosols.
    Wubulihairen M; Lu X; Lee PKH; Ning Z
    Atmos Pollut Res; 2015 Jul; 6(4):556-561. PubMed ID: 32288534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time monitoring of bioaerosols via cell-lysis by air ion and ATP bioluminescence detection.
    Park CW; Park JW; Lee SH; Hwang J
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2014 Feb; 52():379-83. PubMed ID: 24080217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of ATP-based bioluminescence for bioaerosol quantification: effect of sampling method.
    Han T; Wren M; DuBois K; Therkorn J; Mainelis G
    J Aerosol Sci; 2015 Dec; 90():114-123. PubMed ID: 26806982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collection efficiency of liquid-based samplers for fungi in indoor air.
    Chang CW; Ting YT; Horng YJ
    Indoor Air; 2019 May; 29(3):380-389. PubMed ID: 30614570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of flow cytometry for the assessment of preservation and recovery efficiency of bioaerosol samplers spiked with Pantoea agglomerans.
    Rule AM; Kesavan J; Schwab KJ; Buckley TJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2467-72. PubMed ID: 17438801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
    Jensen PA; Todd WF; Davis GN; Scarpino PV
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.