These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32611083)

  • 1. Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model.
    Barrera Lemarchand F; Semeshenko V; Navajas J; Balenzuela P
    Chaos; 2020 Jun; 30(6):063141. PubMed ID: 32611083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human Crowds as Social Networks: Collective Dynamics of Consensus and Polarization.
    Warren WH; Falandays JB; Yoshida K; Wirth TD; Free BA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2024 Mar; 19(2):522-537. PubMed ID: 37526132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Dutch Citizen Forum on Public Reimbursement of Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Opinion Change.
    Jansen M; Baltussen R; Bijlmakers L; Tummers M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Feb; 11(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 32610763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opinion formation on social media: an empirical approach.
    Xiong F; Liu Y
    Chaos; 2014 Mar; 24(1):013130. PubMed ID: 24697392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which opinion should a clinical ethicist give: personal viewpoint or professional consensus?
    Edinger W
    Theor Med; 1992 Mar; 13(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 1604430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The wisdom of stalemates: consensus and clustering as filtering mechanisms for improving collective accuracy.
    Winklmayr C; Kao AB; Bak-Coleman JB; Romanczuk P
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Nov; 287(1938):20201802. PubMed ID: 33143576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Opinion cascade under perception bias in social networks.
    Yu H; Xue B; Zhang J; Liu RR; Liu Y; Meng F
    Chaos; 2023 Nov; 33(11):. PubMed ID: 37909902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Undecided Have the Key: Interaction-Driven Opinion Dynamics in a Three State Model.
    Balenzuela P; Pinasco JP; Semeshenko V
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139572. PubMed ID: 26436421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in social interactions and emergence of extremism in complex social networks.
    Nguyen VX; Xiao G; Zhou J; Li G; Li B
    Chaos; 2020 Oct; 30(10):103110. PubMed ID: 33138463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Private-Public Opinion Discrepancy.
    Manfredi R; Guazzini A; Roos CA; Postmes T; Koudenburg N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242148. PubMed ID: 33237944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The political leaning of the neuroscience discourse about school education in the French press from 2000 to 2020.
    Brun C; Penavayre M; Gonon F
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):121-138. PubMed ID: 37542420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of Social Information by Human Groups.
    Granovskiy B; Gold JM; Sumpter DJ; Goldstone RL
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):469-93. PubMed ID: 26189568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias, belief, and consensus: Collective opinion formation on fluctuating networks.
    Ngampruetikorn V; Stephens GJ
    Phys Rev E; 2016 Nov; 94(5-1):052312. PubMed ID: 27967087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
    Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reaching Consensus by Allowing Moments of Indecision.
    Svenkeson A; Swami A
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():14839. PubMed ID: 26439503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling Adaptive Learning Behaviours for Consensus Formation in Human Societies.
    Yu C; Tan G; Lv H; Wang Z; Meng J; Hao J; Ren F
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27626. PubMed ID: 27282089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview of the role of society and risk in xenotransplantation.
    Sobbrio P; Jorqui M
    Xenotransplantation; 2014; 21(6):523-32. PubMed ID: 25040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scaling up interactive argumentation by providing counterarguments with a chatbot.
    Altay S; Schwartz M; Hacquin AS; Allard A; Blancke S; Mercier H
    Nat Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 6(4):579-592. PubMed ID: 35165435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks.
    Baumann F; Lorenz-Spreen P; Sokolov IM; Starnini M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jan; 124(4):048301. PubMed ID: 32058741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of algorithmic bias and network structure on coexistence, consensus, and polarization of opinions.
    Peralta AF; Neri M; Kertész J; Iñiguez G
    Phys Rev E; 2021 Oct; 104(4-1):044312. PubMed ID: 34781537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.