These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32611151)

  • 1. Estimation of a priori signal-to-noise ratio using neurograms for speech enhancement.
    Jassim WA; Harte N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3830. PubMed ID: 32611151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On training targets for deep learning approaches to clean speech magnitude spectrum estimation.
    Nicolson A; Paliwal KK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 May; 149(5):3273. PubMed ID: 34241115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference-Free Assessment of Speech Intelligibility Using Bispectrum of an Auditory Neurogram.
    Hossain ME; Jassim WA; Zilany MS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150415. PubMed ID: 26967160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Robust Speaker Identification System Using the Responses from a Model of the Auditory Periphery.
    Islam MA; Jassim WA; Cheok NS; Zilany MS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158520. PubMed ID: 27392046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of MVDR beamformer on a Speech Enhancement based Smartphone application for Hearing Aids.
    Shankar N; Kucuk A; Reddy CKA; Bhat GS; Panahi IMS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():417-420. PubMed ID: 30440422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wearable Hearing Device Spectral Enhancement Driven by Non-Negative Sparse Coding-Based Residual Noise Reduction.
    Kim SM
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(20):. PubMed ID: 33050447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech onset enhancement improves intelligibility in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implant users.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():13-22. PubMed ID: 27697583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards real-world objective speech quality and intelligibility assessment using speech-enhancement residuals and convolutional long short-term memory networks.
    Dong X; Williamson DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3348. PubMed ID: 33261399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise-robust speech triage.
    Bartos AL; Cipr T; Nelson DJ; Schwarz P; Banowetz J; Jerabek L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2313. PubMed ID: 29716295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ideal mask-based speech enhancement algorithms for speech mixed with white noise at low mixture signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3458. PubMed ID: 36586840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving quality and intelligibility of speech using single microphone for the broadband fMRI noise at low SNR.
    Vahanesa C; Reddy CK; Panahi IM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():3674-3678. PubMed ID: 28269091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of SNR and Gain-Function Over- and Under-estimation on Speech Intelligibility.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Speech Commun; 2012 Feb; 54(2):272-281. PubMed ID: 22125352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids.
    Kowalewski B; Dau T; May T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520930531. PubMed ID: 32573373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual and Objective Assessment of Envelope Enhancement for Children With Auditory Processing Disorder.
    Moshgelani F; Parsa V; Allan C; Veeranna SA; Allen P
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Jan; 28(1):143-151. PubMed ID: 31804940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.