These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32611159)

  • 1. The role of reliable interaural time difference cues in ambiguous binaural signals for the intelligibility of multitalker speech.
    Schoenmaker E; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):4041. PubMed ID: 32611159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution of binaural masking release to improved speech intelligibility for different masker types.
    Sutojo S; van de Par S; Schoenmaker E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 29855098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The multiple contributions of interaural differences to improved speech intelligibility in multitalker scenarios.
    Schoenmaker E; Brand T; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2589. PubMed ID: 27250153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the importance of interaural noise coherence and the medial olivocochlear reflex for binaural unmasking in free-field listening.
    Marrufo-Pérez MI; Araquistain-Serrat L; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 405():108246. PubMed ID: 33872834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A joint framework for blind prediction of binaural speech intelligibility and perceived listening effort.
    Rennies J; Röttges S; Huber R; Hauth CF; Brand T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108598. PubMed ID: 35995688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility for Binaural Speech with Discarded Low-SNR Speech Components.
    Schoenmaker E; van de Par S
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():73-81. PubMed ID: 27080648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
    Brungart DS; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectro-temporal glimpsing of speech in noise: Regularity and coherence of masking patterns reduces uncertainty and increases intelligibility.
    Fogerty D; Sevich VA; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1552. PubMed ID: 33003879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Redundant Information Is Sometimes More Beneficial Than Spatial Information to Understand Speech in Noise.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):545-554. PubMed ID: 30299342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of interaural differences on speech intelligibility in complex multi-talker environments.
    Ellinger RL; Jakien KM; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL170. PubMed ID: 28253635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectro-temporal modulation glimpsing for speech intelligibility prediction.
    Edraki A; Chan WY; Jensen J; Fogerty D
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108620. PubMed ID: 36175300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coherent Coding of Enhanced Interaural Cues Improves Sound Localization in Noise With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Williges B; Jürgens T; Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518781746. PubMed ID: 29956589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Sluggishness in Binaural Unmasking of Speech for Maskers With Time-Varying Interaural Phase Differences.
    Hauth CF; Brand T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216517753547. PubMed ID: 29338577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.