BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32612904)

  • 1. Retailer perspectives on sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in the California Bay Area.
    Ponce J; Yuan H; Schillinger D; Mahmood H; Lee M; Falbe J; Daniels R; Madsen KA
    Prev Med Rep; 2020 Sep; 19():101129. PubMed ID: 32612904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.
    Silver LD; Ng SW; Ryan-Ibarra S; Taillie LS; Induni M; Miles DR; Poti JM; Popkin BM
    PLoS Med; 2017 Apr; 14(4):e1002283. PubMed ID: 28419108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.
    Roberto CA; Lawman HG; LeVasseur MT; Mitra N; Peterhans A; Herring B; Bleich SN
    JAMA; 2019 May; 321(18):1799-1810. PubMed ID: 31087022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting.
    Roberto CA; Lawman HG; LeVasseur MT; Mitra N; Peterhans A; Herring B; Bleich SN
    JAMA; 2019 May; 321(18):1799-1810. PubMed ID: 32930704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A qualitative study on retailer experiences with Philadelphia's sweetened beverage tax.
    Hua SV; Uzwiak B; Hudgins A; Peterhans A; Lawman HG; Bleich SN; Falbe J; Roberto CA
    Transl Behav Med; 2022 May; 12(4):554-567. PubMed ID: 34347874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Changes in Prices and Purchases Following Implementation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes Across the US.
    Kaplan S; White JS; Madsen KA; Basu S; Villas-Boas SB; Schillinger D
    JAMA Health Forum; 2024 Jan; 5(1):e234737. PubMed ID: 38180765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of the First US Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015-2019.
    Falbe J; Grummon AH; Rojas N; Ryan-Ibarra S; Silver LD; Madsen KA
    Am J Public Health; 2020 Sep; 110(9):1429-1437. PubMed ID: 32673112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longer-term impacts of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and volume sold at two-years post-tax.
    Leider J; Powell LM
    Soc Sci Med; 2022 Jan; 292():114537. PubMed ID: 34838326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Oakland, United States, 2015-2019: A quasi-experimental and cost-effectiveness study.
    White JS; Basu S; Kaplan S; Madsen KA; Villas-Boas SB; Schillinger D
    PLoS Med; 2023 Apr; 20(4):e1004212. PubMed ID: 37071600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Higher Retail Prices of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages 3 Months After Implementation of an Excise Tax in Berkeley, California.
    Falbe J; Rojas N; Grummon AH; Madsen KA
    Am J Public Health; 2015 Nov; 105(11):2194-201. PubMed ID: 26444622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in Beverage Marketing at Stores Following the Oakland Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.
    Zenk SN; Leider J; Pugach O; Pipito AA; Powell LM
    Am J Prev Med; 2020 May; 58(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 32192801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Missed Opportunities: The Need to Promote Public Knowledge and Awareness of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.
    Altman EA; Madsen KA; Schmidt LA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33925290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Higher Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Retail Prices After Excise Taxes in Oakland and San Francisco.
    Falbe J; Lee MM; Kaplan S; Rojas NA; Ortega Hinojosa AM; Madsen KA
    Am J Public Health; 2020 Jul; 110(7):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 32437271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes by Household Income: A Multi-City Comparison of Nielsen Purchasing Data.
    Barker AR; Mazzucca S; An R
    Nutrients; 2022 Feb; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 35267897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of the Oakland sugar-sweetened beverage tax on price promotions of sugar-sweetened and alternative beverages.
    El-Sayed OM; Powell LM
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0285956. PubMed ID: 37294798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longer-term impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on fast-food beverage prices: evidence from Oakland, California, 2-year post-tax.
    Marinello S; Pipito AA; Leider J; Pugach O; Powell LM
    Public Health Nutr; 2021 Aug; 24(11):3571-3575. PubMed ID: 33349292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pass-through of the Oakland, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax in food stores two years post-implementation: A difference-in-differences study.
    Leider J; Li Y; Powell LM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244884. PubMed ID: 33395444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No long-term store marketing changes following sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation: Oakland, California.
    Zenk SN; Li Y; Leider J; Pipito AA; Powell LM
    Health Place; 2021 Mar; 68():102512. PubMed ID: 33517072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Purchasing patterns in low-income neighbourhoods: implications for studying sugar-sweetened beverage taxes.
    Madsen KA; Falbe J; Olgin G; Ibarra-Castro A; Rojas N
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Jul; 22(10):1807-1814. PubMed ID: 30915943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the Role and Strategies of Advocacy Coalitions in California's Statewide Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Debate (2001-2018).
    Garibay KK; Burke NJ; Ramírez AS; Payán DD
    Am J Health Promot; 2024 Jan; 38(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 37728321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.