These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32613875)
1. Are ovarian reserve tests reliable in predicting ovarian response? Results from a prospective, cross-sectional, single-center analysis. Peluso C; Oliveira R; Laporta GZ; Christofolini DM; Fonseca FLA; Laganà AS; Barbosa CP; Bianco B Gynecol Endocrinol; 2021 Apr; 37(4):358-366. PubMed ID: 32613875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive values of anti-müllerian hormone, antral follicle count and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) for assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Ashrafi M; Hemat M; Arabipoor A; Salman Yazdi R; Bahman-Abadi A; Cheraghi R J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 27976974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; Eijkemans MJC; Mochtar MH; van Golde RJT; Hoek A; Kuchenbecker WKH; Fleischer K; de Bruin JP; Groen H; van Wely M; Lambalk CB; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL; Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2485-2495. PubMed ID: 29121350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve Tests and Age in the Prediction of Poor Ovarian Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation-A Real-World Data Analysis of 89,002 Patients. Wang X; Jin L; Mao YD; Shi JZ; Huang R; Jiang YN; Zhang CL; Liang XY Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():702061. PubMed ID: 34526967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The comparison of evaluative effectiveness between antral follicle count/age ratio and ovarian response prediction index for the ovarian reserve and response functions in infertile women. Zhou SJ; Zhao MJ; Li C; Su X Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(36):e21979. PubMed ID: 32899038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive value of anti-müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET. Tsakos E; Tolikas A; Daniilidis A; Asimakopoulos B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 25001569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infertile women below the age of 40 have similar anti-Müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count compared with women of the same age with no history of infertility. Hvidman HW; Bentzen JG; Thuesen LL; Lauritsen MP; Forman JL; Loft A; Pinborg A; Nyboe Andersen A Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1034-45. PubMed ID: 26965431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 2: The predicted hyper responder. Oudshoorn SC; van Tilborg TC; Eijkemans MJC; Oosterhuis GJE; Friederich J; van Hooff MHA; van Santbrink EJP; Brinkhuis EA; Smeenk JMJ; Kwee J; de Koning CH; Groen H; Lambalk CB; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL; Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2506-2514. PubMed ID: 29121269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles. Mutlu MF; Erdem M; Erdem A; Yildiz S; Mutlu I; Arisoy O; Oktem M J Assist Reprod Genet; 2013 Jun; 30(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 23508679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive value of antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone: Which is better for live birth prediction in patients aged over 40 with their first IVF treatment? Lee Y; Kim TH; Park JK; Eum JH; Lee HJ; Kim J; Lyu SW; Kim YS; Lee WS; Yoon TK Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb; 221():151-155. PubMed ID: 29306180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effects of cystectomy for ovary benign cyst on ovarian reserve and pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle]. Zhang XR; Ding LL; Tang R; Sheng Y; Qin YY; Chen ZJ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 27030496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials. Nelson SM; Klein BM; Arce JC Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):923-930.e1. PubMed ID: 25624196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ovarian response is associated with anogenital distance in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF. Fabregues F; González-Foruria I; Peñarrubia J; Carmona F Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1696-1704. PubMed ID: 30016431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing four ovarian reserve markers--associations with ovarian response and live births after assisted reproduction. Brodin T; Hadziosmanovic N; Berglund L; Olovsson M; Holte J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Oct; 94(10):1056-63. PubMed ID: 26184379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AMH has no role in predicting oocyte quality in women with advanced age undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles. Dai X; Wang Y; Yang H; Gao T; Yu C; Cao F; Xia X; Wu J; Zhou X; Chen L Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19750. PubMed ID: 33184364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The status and comparison of ovarian reserve between fertile and infertile healthy Chinese women of reproductive age. Zhou SJ; Sun TC; Song LL; Yang M; Sun XP; Tian L Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(17):e25361. PubMed ID: 33907092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discordance between serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations and antral follicle counts: not only technical issues. Alebic MŠ; Stojanovic N; Dewailly D Hum Reprod; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1141-1148. PubMed ID: 29688494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 1: The predicted poor responder. van Tilborg TC; Torrance HL; Oudshoorn SC; Eijkemans MJC; Koks CAM; Verhoeve HR; Nap AW; Scheffer GJ; Manger AP; Schoot BC; Sluijmer AV; Verhoeff A; Groen H; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2496-2505. PubMed ID: 29121326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new ovarian response prediction index (ORPI): implications for individualised controlled ovarian stimulation. Oliveira JB; Baruffi RL; Petersen CG; Mauri AL; Nascimento AM; Vagnini L; Ricci J; Cavagna M; Franco JG Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2012 Nov; 10():94. PubMed ID: 23171004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]