1124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32614123)
21. Biparametric vs multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of prostate cancer in treatment-naïve patients: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alabousi M; Salameh JP; Gusenbauer K; Samoilov L; Jafri A; Yu H; Alabousi A
BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 30929292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients.
Caglic I; Sushentsev N; Shah N; Warren AY; Lamb BW; Barrett T
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109804. PubMed ID: 34062473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Greco F; Isola M; Cereser L; Como G; Sioletic S; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Ficarra V; Zuiani C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):546-555. PubMed ID: 30187600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening at the Age of 45 Years: Results from the First Screening Round of the PROBASE Trial.
Boschheidgen M; Albers P; Schlemmer HP; Hellms S; Bonekamp D; Sauter A; Hadaschik B; Krilaviciute A; Radtke JP; Seibold P; Lakes J; Arsov C; Gschwend JE; Herkommer K; Makowski M; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Harke N; Debus J; Körber SA; Benner A; Kristiansen G; Giesel FL; Antoch G; Kaaks R; Becker N; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2024 Feb; 85(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 37863727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Current Status of Biparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Literature Analysis.
Belue MJ; Yilmaz EC; Daryanani A; Turkbey B
Life (Basel); 2022 May; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35743835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MRI diagnosis strategy for prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using PI-RADS version 2.1.
Zhang J; Xu L; Zhang G; Zhang X; Bai X; Ji Z; Xiao Y; Sun H; Jin Z
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2905-2916. PubMed ID: 35622121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MRI Based Radiomics Compared With the PI-RADS V2.1 in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI.
Chen T; Zhang Z; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Wang S; Zhao W; Qian X; Zhou Z; Shen J; Dai Y; Hu J
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():792456. PubMed ID: 35127499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Kasel-Seibert M; Lehmann T; Aschenbach R; Guettler FV; Abubrig M; Grimm MO; Teichgraeber U; Franiel T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 26971415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Positive Predictive Values of Biparametric MRI and Multiparametric MRI-directed Transrectal US-guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy.
Schieda N; Nisha Y; Hadziomerovic AR; Prabhakar S; Flood TA; Breau RH; McGrath TA; Ramsay T; Morash C
Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e231383. PubMed ID: 38860899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging has limited added value over T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging when using PI-RADSv2 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA.
De Visschere P; Lumen N; Ost P; Decaestecker K; Pattyn E; Villeirs G
Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 27726850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prostate cancer local staging using biparametric MRI: assessment and comparison with multiparametric MRI.
Christophe C; Montagne S; Bourrelier S; Roupret M; Barret E; Rozet F; Comperat E; Coté JF; Lucidarme O; Cussenot O; Granger B; Renard-Penna R
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109350. PubMed ID: 33080549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prospective evaluation of the value of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging for prostate cancer detection, with pathology correlation.
Al Salmi I; Menezes T; El-Khodary M; Monteiro S; Haider EA; Alabousi A
Can J Urol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):10220-10227. PubMed ID: 32544044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomy using routine clinical prostate multiparametric MRI and decipher genomic score.
Jambor I; Falagario U; Ratnani P; Perez IM; Demir K; Merisaari H; Sobotka S; Haines GK; Martini A; Beksac AT; Lewis S; Pahikkala T; Wiklund P; Nair S; Tewari A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Apr; 51(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 31566845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2: A multireader study.
Smith CP; Harmon SA; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Law YM; Shebel H; An JY; Czarniecki M; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(6):1694-1703. PubMed ID: 30575184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer.
Tamada T; Ueda Y; Ueno Y; Kojima Y; Kido A; Yamamoto A
MAGMA; 2022 Aug; 35(4):533-547. PubMed ID: 34491467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multiparametric MRI model with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging enables breast cancer diagnosis with high accuracy.
Zhang M; Horvat JV; Bernard-Davila B; Marino MA; Leithner D; Ochoa-Albiztegui RE; Helbich TH; Morris EA; Thakur S; Pinker K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):864-874. PubMed ID: 30375702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk.
Bass EJ; Pantovic A; Connor M; Gabe R; Padhani AR; Rockall A; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Sep; 24(3):596-611. PubMed ID: 33219368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
