These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3261513)
1. The use of conventional vs low-osmolar contrast agents: a legal analysis. Reuter SR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Sep; 151(3):529-31. PubMed ID: 3261513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Malpractice, informed consent, and the use of low osmolality contrast media. Eisner JM; Casey BJ Conn Med; 1988 Feb; 52(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 3278846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective use of radiographic low-osmolality contrast media in the 1990s. Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Sonnad SS; Cohan NS Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):297-311. PubMed ID: 8685315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Malpractice issues and contrast use. Bush WH; Albright DE; Sather JS J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Apr; 2(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 17411828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The introduction of low-osmolar contrast agents in radiology. Medical, economic, legal, and public policy issues. Jacobson PD; Rosenquist CJ JAMA; 1988 Sep; 260(11):1586-92. PubMed ID: 3137372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contrast medium incident from the legal viewpoint]. Schlund GH Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 9081411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should nonionic radiographic contrast media be given to all patients? Parfrey PS; Cramer BC; McManamon PJ CMAJ; 1988 Mar; 138(6):497-500. PubMed ID: 3278782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Written informed consent for i.v. contrast-enhanced radiography. Porter DH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jul; 153(1):188-9. PubMed ID: 2735286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Medico-legal responsibilities in complications induced by organic-iodized contrast media]. Ottolenghi G J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56 suppl 1():143. PubMed ID: 1232125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The physician's obligation to inform the patient in the diagnostic use of iodine-containing contrast media]. Kern BR; Laufs A Rontgenpraxis; 1982 Feb; 35(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 7071671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ionic vs. nonionic contrast media. Lloyd K Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 7997528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Complications of cardiovascular radiography with contrast media. Confrontation of the radiologist and medico-legal expert]. Di Guglielmo L; Fornari A Radiol Med; 1978 Apr; 64(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 704979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent. Wilson P Med J Aust; 1985 Jun; 142(13):704-6. PubMed ID: 4010594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media. Berlin L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1095-7. PubMed ID: 8911157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]