These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32615432)
1. Preservation of the fecal samples at ambient temperature for microbiota analysis with a cost-effective and reliable stabilizer EffcGut. Yang L; Hou K; Zhang B; Ouyang C; Lin A; Xu S; Ke D; Fang L; Chen Q; Wu J; Yan C; Lian Y; Jiang T; He J; Wang H; Fu Y; Xiao C; Chen Z Sci Total Environ; 2020 Nov; 741():140423. PubMed ID: 32615432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles. Chen CC; Wu WK; Chang CM; Panyod S; Lu TP; Liou JM; Fang YJ; Chuang EY; Wu MS J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Dec; 119(12):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 32111519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics. Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation. Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods]. Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ionic liquid-based reagents improve the stability of midterm fecal sample storage. Hao L; Xia Z; Yang H; Wang J; Han M J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():68-73. PubMed ID: 28506638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study. Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel affordable reagent for room temperature storage and transport of fecal samples for metagenomic analyses. Han M; Hao L; Lin Y; Li F; Wang J; Yang H; Xiao L; Kristiansen K; Jia H; Li J Microbiome; 2018 Feb; 6(1):43. PubMed ID: 29482661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method. Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants. Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks. Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of the long-term storage of human fecal microbiota samples collected in RNAlater. Tap J; Cools-Portier S; Pavan S; Druesne A; Öhman L; Törnblom H; Simren M; Derrien M Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):601. PubMed ID: 30679604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples. Kim JH; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Ha N; Kim JK; Moon SJ; Kim MG Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):114. PubMed ID: 36596832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples. Rounge TB; Meisal R; Nordby JI; Ambur OH; de Lange T; Hoff G BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 30409123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of preservation method on canine ( Horng KR; Ganz HH; Eisen JA; Marks SL PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4827. PubMed ID: 29844978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative methods for fecal sample storage to preserve gut microbial structure and function in an in vitro model of the human colon. Deschamps C; Fournier E; Uriot O; Lajoie F; Verdier C; Comtet-Marre S; Thomas M; Kapel N; Cherbuy C; Alric M; Almeida M; Etienne-Mesmin L; Blanquet-Diot S Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 104(23):10233-10247. PubMed ID: 33085024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of field conditions on fecal microbiota. Hale VL; Tan CL; Niu K; Yang Y; Cui D; Zhao H; Knight R; Amato KR J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():180-188. PubMed ID: 27686380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpersonal Variations in Gut Microbiota Profiles Supersedes the Effects of Differing Fecal Storage Conditions. Bundgaard-Nielsen C; Hagstrøm S; Sørensen S Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17367. PubMed ID: 30478355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]