205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32616430)
1. Magnetorheological Gel Mimicking Cervical Ripening as a Potential Model for Evaluating Shear Wave Elastography.
Ge W; Brooker G; Woo J; Rae W; Liu Y; Hyett J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):2472-2480. PubMed ID: 32616430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anisotropic polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel phantom for shear wave elastography in fibrous biological soft tissue: a multimodality characterization.
Chatelin S; Bernal M; Deffieux T; Papadacci C; Flaud P; Nahas A; Boccara C; Gennisson JL; Tanter M; Pernot M
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):6923-40. PubMed ID: 25350315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of oil-in-gelatin phantoms for viscoelasticity measurement in ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Nguyen MM; Zhou S; Robert JL; Shamdasani V; Xie H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 24139915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification process based on shear wave propagation within a phantom using finite element modelling and magnetic resonance elastography.
Leclerc GE; Charleux F; Ho Ba Tho MC; Bensamoun SF
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 23947476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kelvin-Voigt Parameters Reconstruction of Cervical Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms Using Torsional Wave Elastography.
Callejas A; Gomez A; Faris IH; Melchor J; Rus G
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 31349721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of anisotropic mechanical properties in porcine brain white matter ex vivo using magnetic resonance elastography.
Schmidt JL; Tweten DJ; Badachhape AA; Reiter AJ; Okamoto RJ; Garbow JR; Bayly PV
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Mar; 79():30-37. PubMed ID: 29253729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound-based transient elastography compared to magnetic resonance elastography in soft tissue-mimicking gels.
Oudry J; Vappou J; Choquet P; Willinger R; Sandrin L; Constantinesco A
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):6979-90. PubMed ID: 19887718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of quantitative shear wave MR-elastography with mechanical compression tests.
Hamhaber U; Grieshaber FA; Nagel JH; Klose U
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Jan; 49(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 12509821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.
Zhu Y; Dong C; Yin Y; Chen X; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Zhang X; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic Resonance Elastography Reconstruction for Anisotropic Tissues.
Babaei B; Fovargue D; Lloyd RA; Miller R; Jugé L; Kaplan M; Sinkus R; Nordsletten DA; Bilston LE
Med Image Anal; 2021 Dec; 74():102212. PubMed ID: 34587584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Scholte wave approach for ultrasonic surface acoustic wave elastography.
Liu J; Leer J; Aglayomov SR; Emelianov SY
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4138-4150. PubMed ID: 36971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anisotropic composite material phantom to improve skeletal muscle characterization using magnetic resonance elastography.
Guidetti M; Lorgna G; Hammersly M; Lewis P; Klatt D; Vena P; Shah R; Royston TJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Jan; 89():199-208. PubMed ID: 30292169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dispersion in Tissue-Mimicking Gels Measured with Shear Wave Elastography and Torsional Vibration Rheometry.
Yengul SS; Barbone PE; Madore B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):586-604. PubMed ID: 30473175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance Study of a Torsional Wave Sensor and Cervical Tissue Characterization.
Callejas A; Gomez A; Melchor J; Riveiro M; Massó P; Torres J; López-López MT; Rus G
Sensors (Basel); 2017 Sep; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 28891995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tissue mimicking materials for the detection of prostate cancer using shear wave elastography: a validation study.
Cao R; Huang Z; Varghese T; Nabi G
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):022903. PubMed ID: 23387774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of biomechanical properties of agar based tissue mimicking phantoms for ultrasound stiffness imaging techniques.
Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():132-43. PubMed ID: 24769915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance elastography in nonlinear viscoelastic materials under load.
Capilnasiu A; Hadjicharalambous M; Fovargue D; Patel D; Holub O; Bilston L; Screen H; Sinkus R; Nordsletten D
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2019 Feb; 18(1):111-135. PubMed ID: 30151814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft tissue rheology and its implications for elastography: Challenges and opportunities.
Bilston LE
NMR Biomed; 2018 Oct; 31(10):e3832. PubMed ID: 28991387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supersonic transient magnetic resonance elastography for quantitative assessment of tissue elasticity.
Liu Y; Liu J; Fite BZ; Foiret J; Ilovitsh A; Leach JK; Dumont E; Caskey CF; Ferrara KW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4083-4106. PubMed ID: 28426437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidelines for Finite-Element Modeling of Acoustic Radiation Force-Induced Shear Wave Propagation in Tissue-Mimicking Media.
Palmeri ML; Qiang B; Chen S; Urban MW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Jan; 64(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 28026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
