125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32616450)
1. Effective doses of dental cone beam computed tomography: effect of 360-degree versus 180-degree rotation angles.
Mutalik S; Tadinada A; Molina MR; Sinisterra A; Lurie A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Oct; 130(4):433-446. PubMed ID: 32616450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms.
Morant JJ; Salvadó M; Hernández-Girón I; Casanovas R; Ortega R; Calzado A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):92555893. PubMed ID: 22933532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units.
Ludlow JB; Timothy R; Walker C; Hunter R; Benavides E; Samuelson DB; Scheske MJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140197. PubMed ID: 25224586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proposed Diagnostic Reference Levels in the Missouri/Southern Illinois Region Associated with Cone-beam Computed Tomography Use in Endodontics.
Popkowski A; Rhodes SC; Hatton JF
J Endod; 2024 Jul; 50(7):966-975. PubMed ID: 38382736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations.
Kralik I; Faj D; Lauc T; Škarica M; Popić J; Brkic H
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 30264736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ.
Nascimento HAR; Andrade MEA; Frazão MAG; Nascimento EHL; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 29160405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.
Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of scan mode (partial/full rotations) and FOV size in the formation of artefacts in cone beam CT.
Costa EDD; Queiroz PM; Santaella GM; Capelozza ALA; Ambrosano GMB; Freitas DQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 May; 48(4):20180340. PubMed ID: 30563362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective dose estimation in cone-beam computed tomography for dental use by Monte-Carlo simulation optimizing calculation numbers using a step-and-shoot method.
Ozaki Y; Watanabe H; Kurabayashi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Oct; 50(7):20210084. PubMed ID: 33929892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of the radiation dose for dental spectral cone-beam CT.
Orhan K; Pauwels R; Chen Y; Song D; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200372. PubMed ID: 33353401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for dental cone-beam computed tomography in pediatric patients.
Ito M; Chida K; Onodera S; Kojima I; Iikubo M; Kato T; Fujisawa M; Zuguchi M
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Sep; 43(3):. PubMed ID: 37696261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Gröndahl K
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 20965675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of dental cone-beam CT dose conversion coefficients.
Mah E; Ritenour ER; Yao H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Mar; 50(3):20200225. PubMed ID: 33112658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of thyroid gland shielding on radiation doses in dental cone beam computed tomography with small and medium fields of view.
Grüning M; Koivisto J; Mah J; Bumann A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Aug; 134(2):245-253. PubMed ID: 35534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
