125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32616450)
21. Absorbed dose measurements for kV-cone beam computed tomography in image-guided radiation therapy.
Hioki K; Araki F; Ohno T; Nakaguchi Y; Tomiyama Y
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(23):7297-313. PubMed ID: 25383908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An analysis of patient dose received during cone-beam computed tomography in relation to scan settings and imaging indications as seen in a dental institution in order to establish institutional diagnostic reference levels.
Hung KF; Hui L; Yeung AWK; Jacobs R; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Jul; 51(5):20200529. PubMed ID: 35230883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of cone beam CT (CBCT) scan parameters on size specific dose estimate (SSDE): a Monte Carlo study.
Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ; Demirkaya O
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(11):115002. PubMed ID: 30822764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dosimetry of Three Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Scanners at Different Fields of View in Terms of Various Head and Neck Organs.
Nikneshan S; Aghamiri MR; Moudi E; Bahemmat N; Hadian H
Iran J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 13(3):e34220. PubMed ID: 27853498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dosimetric evaluation for temporomandibular joint cone beam computed tomography exams using different field of view.
Pinto CA; Caetano GFDR; Andrade MEA; Panzarella FK; Junqueira JLC; Peroni LV; Nascimento MDCC
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Sep; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34488205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging.
Deman P; Atwal P; Duzenli C; Thakur Y; Ford NL
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):3201-22. PubMed ID: 24862349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units.
Al Najjar A; Colosi D; Dauer LT; Prins R; Patchell G; Branets I; Goren AD; Faber RD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 23726328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measuring absorbed dose for i-CAT CBCT examinations in child, adolescent and adult phantoms.
Choi E; Ford NL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(6):20150018. PubMed ID: 25785822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone].
Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of the effective doses from two dental cone beam CT devices.
Schilling R; Geibel MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120273. PubMed ID: 23420855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiation dose reduction in cone-beam computed tomography of extremities: evaluation of a novel radiation shield.
Matikka H; Virén T
J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):N57-63. PubMed ID: 24894593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: effect of field of view size and position.
Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Bosmans H; Panmekiate S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Feb; 121(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 26792756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimation of the effective dose of dental cone-beam computed tomography using personal computer-based Monte Carlo software.
Kim EK; Han WJ; Choi JW; Battulga B
Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Mar; 48(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 29581946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimation of the radiation dose for pediatric CBCT indications: a prospective study on ProMax3D.
Marcu M; Hedesiu M; Salmon B; Pauwels R; Stratis A; Oenning ACC; Cohen ME; Jacobs R; Baciut M; Roman R; Dinu C; Rotaru H; Barbur I;
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 May; 28(3):300-309. PubMed ID: 29356184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation for dose assessment in dental cone beam CT examinations.
Morant JJ; Salvadó M; Casanovas R; Hernández-Girón I; Velasco E; Calzado A
Phys Med; 2012 Jul; 28(3):200-9. PubMed ID: 21807542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.
Pauwels R; Pittayapat P; Sinpitaksakul P; Panmekiate S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(8):20200597. PubMed ID: 33882256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study.
Niktash A; Mehralizadeh S; Talaeipour A
Front Dent; 2022; 19():32. PubMed ID: 36865948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
