These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32616450)

  • 21. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
    Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms.
    Morant JJ; Salvadó M; Hernández-Girón I; Casanovas R; Ortega R; Calzado A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):92555893. PubMed ID: 22933532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Proposed Diagnostic Reference Levels in the Missouri/Southern Illinois Region Associated with Cone-beam Computed Tomography Use in Endodontics.
    Popkowski A; Rhodes SC; Hatton JF
    J Endod; 2024 Jul; 50(7):966-975. PubMed ID: 38382736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
    Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effective doses of dental cone beam computed tomography: effect of 360-degree versus 180-degree rotation angles.
    Mutalik S; Tadinada A; Molina MR; Sinisterra A; Lurie A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Oct; 130(4):433-446. PubMed ID: 32616450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units.
    Ludlow JB; Timothy R; Walker C; Hunter R; Benavides E; Samuelson DB; Scheske MJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140197. PubMed ID: 25224586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A review of dental cone-beam CT dose conversion coefficients.
    Mah E; Ritenour ER; Yao H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Mar; 50(3):20200225. PubMed ID: 33112658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton: a systematic review.
    Al-Okshi A; Lindh C; Salé H; Gunnarsson M; Rohlin M
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 88(1045):20140658. PubMed ID: 25486387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A meta-review of effective doses in dental and maxillofacial cone beam CT using the ROBIS tool.
    Al-Okshi A; Horner K; Rohlin M
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210042. PubMed ID: 33989050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 2.