These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32616625)

  • 1. The Value in Science-Art Partnerships for Science Education and Science Communication.
    Zaelzer C
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 32616625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [From popularization to participation: communicating science in the "knowledge society".].
    Scalari A
    Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Jan; 108(1):14-17. PubMed ID: 28151524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirically supported out-of-the-box strategies for science communication by environmental scientists.
    Langan LM; Cheng Y; Hunka AD
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jul; 15(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 30900811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Art-Science Collaboration in an EPSRC/BBSRC-Funded Synthetic Biology UK Research Centre.
    Reinsborough M
    Nanoethics; 2020; 14(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 32435319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to design an art-science program? Self-reported benefits for artists and scientists in the VI4 artist-in-residence program.
    Cuevas S; Liu QK; Qian H; Joffe ME; Calvitti K; Schladt M; Skaar EP; Oliver KH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279183. PubMed ID: 36584033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Science Communication Training Imparts Confidence and Influences Public Engagement Activity.
    Swords CM; Porter JS; Hawkins AJ; Li E; Rowland-Goldsmith M; Koci MD; Tansey JT; Woitowich NC
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2023 Aug; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 37614888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New-media arts-based public engagement projects could reshape the future of the generative biology.
    Ahmedien DAM
    Med Humanit; 2021 Sep; 47(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 32467304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Biota Project: A Case Study of a Multimedia, Grassroots Approach to Scientific Communication for Engaging Diverse Audiences.
    Cheng H; Dove NC; Mena JM; Perez T; Ul-Hasan S
    Integr Comp Biol; 2018 Dec; 58(6):1294-1303. PubMed ID: 29992244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicating Science: A Shared Responsibility.
    Hanafiah KM
    Malays J Med Sci; 2018 Sep; 25(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 30914858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? How do the shifting information flows in healthcare affect the deficit model of science communication?
    Ko H
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 27117770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Storytelling Brain: How Neuroscience Stories Help Bridge the Gap between Research and Society.
    Martinez-Conde S; Alexander RG; Blum D; Britton N; Lipska BK; Quirk GJ; Swiss JI; Willems RM; Macknik SL
    J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 39(42):8285-8290. PubMed ID: 31619498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. It is essential to connect: Evaluating a Science Communication Boot Camp.
    Longtin K; Wisner R; Organ JM
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2022 Apr; 305(4):992-999. PubMed ID: 35166464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Science communication gets personal: Ambivalent effects of self-disclosure in science communication on trust in science.
    Altenmüller MS; Kampschulte L; Verbeek L; Gollwitzer M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Dec; 29(4):793-812. PubMed ID: 37589716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The art of talking about science: beginning to teach physiology students how to communicate with nonscientists.
    Petzold AM; Dunbar RL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2018 Jun; 42(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29616574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
    Dudo A; Besley JC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148867. PubMed ID: 26913869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thirty years of science-society interfaces: What's next?
    Scheufele DA
    Public Underst Sci; 2022 Apr; 31(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 35491913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Science Communication Through Art: Objectives, Challenges, and Outcomes.
    Lesen AE; Rogan A; Blum MJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2016 Sep; 31(9):657-660. PubMed ID: 27377601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientists' incentives and attitudes toward public communication.
    Rose KM; Markowitz EM; Brossard D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(3):1274-1276. PubMed ID: 31911470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.