These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32616696)
1. Comparison of mass transfer parameters inside a USEPA flux hood for two VOCs. Cupertino KF; Prata AA; Le-Minh N; Stuetz RM; Santos JM Water Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 81(7):1445-1451. PubMed ID: 32616696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Volatile organic compounds at swine facilities: a critical review. Ni JQ; Robarge WP; Xiao C; Heber AJ Chemosphere; 2012 Oct; 89(7):769-88. PubMed ID: 22682363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic flux chamber measurements of hydrogen sulfide emission rate from a quiescent surface--A computational evaluation. Prata AA; Santos JM; Beghi SP; Fernandes IF; Vom Marttens LL; Pereira Neto LI; Martins RS; Reis NC; Stuetz RM Chemosphere; 2016 Mar; 146():426-34. PubMed ID: 26741548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitoring of odors emitted from stabilized dewatered sludge subjected to aging using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry. Byliński H; Barczak RJ; Gębicki J; Namieśnik J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(6):5500-5513. PubMed ID: 30610582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A critical review on liquid-gas mass transfer models for estimating gaseous emissions from passive liquid surfaces in wastewater treatment plants. Prata AA; Santos JM; Timchenko V; Stuetz RM Water Res; 2018 Mar; 130():388-406. PubMed ID: 29258050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison and development of dynamic flux chambers to determine odorous compound emission rates from area sources. Leyris C; Guillot JM; Fanlo JL; Pourtier L Chemosphere; 2005 Apr; 59(3):415-21. PubMed ID: 15763094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the fetch parameter on results from empirical correlations for estimating odorous emissions at passive liquid surfaces. Prata AA; Calvo MJ; Boncardo G; Sivret EC; Santos JM; Timchenko V; Stuetz RM Water Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 74(10):2384-2391. PubMed ID: 27858794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of the liquid-gas partitioning behavior of major wastewater odorants using two comparative experimental approaches: liquid sample-based vaporization vs. impinger-based dynamic headspace extraction into sorbent tubes. Iqbal MA; Kim KH; Szulejko JE; Cho J Anal Bioanal Chem; 2014 Jan; 406(2):643-55. PubMed ID: 24271272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of an H Tian L; Han C; Zhang J; Ouyang Y; Xi J J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Oct; 71(10):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 34100672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aerodynamic performance of a low-speed wind tunnel. Frechen FB; Frey M; Wett M; Löser C Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):57-64. PubMed ID: 15484743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different approaches for the estimation of odour emissions from landfill surfaces. Lucernoni F; Capelli L; Sironi S Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():345-353. PubMed ID: 27769653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Emission and health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in various processes of a petroleum refinery in the Pearl River Delta, China. Zhang Z; Yan X; Gao F; Thai P; Wang H; Chen D; Zhou L; Gong D; Li Q; Morawska L; Wang B Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():452-461. PubMed ID: 29587216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of Time-Weighted Average Sampling of Odorous Volatile Organic Compounds in Air with Solid-Phase Microextraction Fiber Housed inside a GC Glass Liner: Proof of Concept. Tursumbayeva M; Koziel JA; Maurer DL; Kenessov B; Rice S Molecules; 2019 Jan; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 30678060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential air toxics hot spots in truck terminals and cabs. Smith TJ; Davis ME; Hart JE; Blicharz A; Laden F; Garshick E; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Dec; (172):5-82. PubMed ID: 23409510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emission characteristics and associated health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds from a typical coking wastewater treatment plant. Zhang Y; Wei C; Yan B Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 693():133417. PubMed ID: 31374506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gas-particle partitioning of odorants in a pig house measured by thermal desorption GC/MS. Andersen KB; Glasius M; Feilberg A Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May; 16(5):1059-68. PubMed ID: 24654010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Odorant emissions from intensive pig production measured by online proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. Feilberg A; Liu D; Adamsen AP; Hansen MJ; Jonassen KE Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Aug; 44(15):5894-900. PubMed ID: 20586445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]