134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32617188)
1. A high proportion of red snapper sold in North Carolina is mislabeled.
Spencer ET; Richards E; Steinwand B; Clemons J; Dahringer J; Desai P; Fisher M; Fussell S; Gorman O; Jones D; Le A; Long K; McMahan C; Moscarito C; Pelay C; Price E; Smith A; VanSant A; Bruno JF
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9218. PubMed ID: 32617188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using DNA barcoding to track seafood mislabeling in Los Angeles restaurants.
Willette DA; Simmonds SE; Cheng SH; Esteves S; Kane TL; Nuetzel H; Pilaud N; Rachmawati R; Barber PH
Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 28075039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marketplace shrimp mislabeling in North Carolina.
Korzik ML; Austin HM; Cooper B; Jasperse C; Tan G; Richards E; Spencer ET; Steinwand B; Fodrie FJ; Bruno JF
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229512. PubMed ID: 32163430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial and Dietary Overlap Creates Potential for Competition between Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) and Vermilion snapper (Rhomboplites aurorubens).
Davis WT; Drymon JM; Powers SP
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144051. PubMed ID: 26630481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple drivers behind mislabeling of fish from artisanal fisheries in La Paz, Mexico.
Munguia-Vega A; Weaver AH; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Peckham H
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10750. PubMed ID: 33575131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating seafood substitution problems and consequences in Taiwan using molecular barcoding and deep microbiome profiling.
Chen PY; Ho CW; Chen AC; Huang CY; Liu TY; Liang KH
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21997. PubMed ID: 33319856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A glimpse into the genetic diversity of the Peruvian seafood sector: Unveiling species substitution, mislabeling and trade of threatened species.
Marín A; Serna J; Robles C; Ramírez B; Reyes-Flores LE; Zelada-Mázmela E; Sotil G; Alfaro R
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206596. PubMed ID: 30444869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA barcoding reveals global and local influences on patterns of mislabeling and substitution in the trade of fish in Mexico.
Munguia-Vega A; Terrazas-Tapia R; Dominguez-Contreras JF; Reyna-Fabian M; Zapata-Morales P
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0265960. PubMed ID: 35421106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consequences of seafood mislabeling for marine populations and fisheries management.
Kroetz K; Luque GM; Gephart JA; Jardine SL; Lee P; Chicojay Moore K; Cole C; Steinkruger A; Donlan CJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(48):30318-30323. PubMed ID: 33199620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microbiota of wild-caught Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus.
Tarnecki AM; Patterson WF; Arias CR
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):245. PubMed ID: 27769187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of DNA barcoding to reveal species composition of convenience seafood.
Huxley-Jones E; Shaw JL; Fletcher C; Parnell J; Watts PC
Conserv Biol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 22268756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in maricultured fish, Lates calcarifer (Barramudi), Lutjanus campechanus (red snapper) and Lutjanus griseus (grey snapper).
Nasyitah Sobihah N; Ahmad Zaharin A; Khairul Nizam M; Ley Juen L; Kyoung-Woong K
Chemosphere; 2018 Apr; 197():318-324. PubMed ID: 29360594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioinformatics Approach to Mitigate Mislabeling in EU Seafood Market and Protect Consumer Health.
Vindigni G; Pulvirenti A; Alaimo S; Monaco C; Spina D; Peri I
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34299949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA Analysis Detects Different Mislabeling Trend by Country in European Cod Fillets.
Feldmann F; Ardura A; Blanco-Fernandez C; Garcia-Vazquez E
Foods; 2021 Jun; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 34209308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Evaluation of Web Page and Label Presentation for Imported Seafood Products Sold on Chinese E-Commerce Platform and Molecular Identification Using DNA Barcoding.
Xiong X; Yuan F; Huang M; Cao M; Xiong X
J Food Prot; 2020 Feb; 83(2):256-265. PubMed ID: 31961225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA Barcoding analysis of seafood accuracy in Washington, D.C. restaurants.
Stern DB; Castro Nallar E; Rathod J; Crandall KA
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3234. PubMed ID: 28462038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High level of mislabeling in Spanish and Greek hake markets suggests the fraudulent introduction of African species.
Garcia-Vazquez E; Perez J; Martinez JL; Pardiñas AF; Lopez B; Karaiskou N; Casa MF; Machado-Schiaffino G; Triantafyllidis A
J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Jan; 59(2):475-80. PubMed ID: 21175190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection and identification of marine fish mislabeling in Guangzhou's supermarkets and sushi restaurants using DNA barcoding.
Liu B; Yang JW; Liu BS; Zhang N; Guo L; Guo HY; Zhang DC
J Food Sci; 2022 Jun; 87(6):2440-2449. PubMed ID: 35438192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Packaged frozen fishery products: species identification, mislabeling occurrence and legislative implications.
Di Pinto A; Mottola A; Marchetti P; Bottaro M; Terio V; Bozzo G; Bonerba E; Ceci E; Tantillo G
Food Chem; 2016 Mar; 194():279-83. PubMed ID: 26471555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chilean Salmon Sushi: Genetics Reveals Product Mislabeling and a Lack of Reliable Information at the Point of Sale.
Prida V; Sepúlveda M; Quezada-Romegialli C; Harrod C; Gomez-Uchida D; Cid B; Canales-Aguirre CB
Foods; 2020 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 33228244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
