216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32620404)
1. A scoring system for 3D surface images of breast reconstruction developed using the Delphi consensus process.
Godden AR; Wood SH; James SE; MacNeill FA; Rusby JE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 32620404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3-Dimensional objective aesthetic evaluation to replace panel assessment after breast-conserving treatment.
Godden AR; O'Connell RL; Barry PA; Krupa KCD; Wolf LM; Mohammed K; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
Breast Cancer; 2020 Nov; 27(6):1126-1136. PubMed ID: 32562188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In Search of a Gold Standard Scoring System for the Subjective Evaluation of Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Therapy.
Racz JM; Hong NL; Latosinsky S
Breast J; 2015; 21(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 25940058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Weber WP; Haug M; Kurzeder C; Bjelic-Radisic V; Koller R; Reitsamer R; Fitzal F; Biazus J; Brenelli F; Urban C; Paulinelli RR; Blohmer JU; Heil J; Hoffmann J; Matrai Z; Catanuto G; Galimberti V; Gentilini O; Barry M; Hadar T; Allweis TM; Olsha O; Cardoso MJ; Gouveia PF; Rubio IT; de Boniface J; Svensjö T; Bucher S; Dubsky P; Farhadi J; Fehr MK; Fulco I; Ganz-Blättler U; Günthert A; Harder Y; Hauser N; Kappos EA; Knauer M; Landin J; Mechera R; Meani F; Montagna G; Ritter M; Saccilotto R; Schwab FD; Steffens D; Tausch C; Zeindler J; Soysal SD; Lohsiriwat V; Kovacs T; Tansley A; Wyld L; Romics L; El-Tamer M; Pusic AL; Sacchini V; Gnant M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Dec; 172(3):523-537. PubMed ID: 30182349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy: An Italian expert Delphi consensus statements and critical review.
Meattini I; Becherini C; Bernini M; Bonzano E; Criscitiello C; De Rose F; De Santis MC; Fontana A; Franco P; Gentilini OD; Livi L; Meduri B; Parisi S; Pasinetti N; Prisco A; Rocco N
Cancer Treat Rev; 2021 Sep; 99():102236. PubMed ID: 34126314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The development of a low cost 3D surface imaging system to measure breast volume: Defining minimum standards using an adapted Delphi consensus study.
Probst H; Choppin SB; Wheat JS; Harrison M; Goyal A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1770-2. PubMed ID: 26454415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The potential role of three-dimensional surface imaging as a tool to evaluate aesthetic outcome after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT).
O'Connell RL; Di Micco R; Khabra K; Wolf L; deSouza N; Roche N; Barry PA; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):385-393. PubMed ID: 28447239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals.
Maass SW; Bagher S; Hofer SO; Baxter NN; Zhong T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22(13):4305-16. PubMed ID: 25691279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consensus Statement on Robotic Mastectomy-Expert Panel From International Endoscopic and Robotic Breast Surgery Symposium (IERBS) 2019.
Lai HW; Toesca A; Sarfati B; Park HS; Houvenaeghel G; Selber JC; Cheng FT; Kuo WL; Peradze N; Song SY; Mok CW
Ann Surg; 2020 Jun; 271(6):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 31977514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical assessment of breast symmetry and aesthetic outcome: can 3D imaging be the gold standard?
Bai L; Lundström O; Johansson H; Meybodi F; Arver B; Sandelin K; Wickman M; Brandberg Y
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2023; 57(1-6):145-152. PubMed ID: 35034560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Novel Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale.
Duraes EFR; Durand P; Morisada M; Scomacao I; Duraes LC; de Sousa JB; Abedi N; Djohan RS; Bernard S; Moreira A; Schwarz GS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jun; 149(6):1297-1308. PubMed ID: 35349538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for oncoplastic, reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.
O'Connell RL; Stevens RJ; Harris PA; Rusby JE
Breast; 2015 Aug; 24(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 25935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aesthetic outcomes in women undergoing breast-conserving therapy followed by mastectomy and microsurgical reconstruction.
Khansa I; Boehmler JH
Microsurgery; 2015 Jan; 35(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 24449018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to Optimize Aesthetics for the Partial Mastectomy Patient.
Losken A; Brown CA
Aesthet Surg J; 2020 Nov; 40(Suppl 2):S55-S65. PubMed ID: 33202013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of 3D images in the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Results from a prospective multicentric clinical trial.
Cardoso MJ; Vrieling C; Cardoso JS; Oliveira HP; Williams NR; Dixon JM; ;
Breast; 2018 Oct; 41():19-24. PubMed ID: 29940498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Consensus Statement Using Modified Delphi Methodology.
Wright FC; Look Hong NJ; Quan ML; Beyfuss K; Temple S; Covelli A; Baxter N; Gagliardi AR
Ann Surg; 2018 Feb; 267(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 28594745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validated Outcomes in the Grafting of Autologous Fat to the Breast: The VOGUE Study. Development of a Core Outcome Set for Research and Audit.
Agha RA; Pidgeon TE; Borrelli MR; Dowlut N; Orkar TK; Ahmed M; Pujji O; Orgill DP;
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):633e-638e. PubMed ID: 29697603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants.
Gahm J; Jurell G; Edsander-Nord A; Wickman M
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 19071075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Vectra® XT 3D Surface Imaging Technology in Measuring Breast Symmetry and Breast Volume.
Pham M; Alzul R; Elder E; French J; Cardoso J; Kaviani A; Meybodi F
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Feb; 47(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 36149443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Competence in EVAR Procedures: A Novel Rating Scale Developed by the Delphi Technique.
Strøm M; Lönn L; Bech B; Schroeder TV; Konge L;
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2017 Jul; 54(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 28549712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
