209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32621525)
1. Rethinking counselling in prenatal screening: An ethical analysis of informed consent in the context of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
Kater-Kuipers A; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RH; Bunnik EM
Bioethics; 2020 Sep; 34(7):671-678. PubMed ID: 32621525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.
Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RJH
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 30340550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences.
Cernat A; De Freitas C; Majid U; Trivedi F; Higgins C; Vanstone M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):27. PubMed ID: 30642270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges.
de Jong A; Maya I; van Lith JM
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25521968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Canadian Pregnant Women's Preferences Regarding NIPT for Down Syndrome: The Information They Want, How They Want to Get It, and With Whom They Want to Discuss It.
Laberge AM; Birko S; Lemoine MÈ; Le Clerc-Blain J; Haidar H; Affdal AO; Dupras C; Ravitsky V
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jun; 41(6):782-791. PubMed ID: 30738740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access.
Bunnik EM; Kater-Kuipers A; Galjaard RH; de Beaufort ID
J Med Ethics; 2020 Mar; 46(3):194-198. PubMed ID: 31527142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal testing: Does reproductive autonomy succeed in dispelling eugenic concerns?
Begović D
Bioethics; 2019 Oct; 33(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 31264236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of 'routinisation' in prenatal screening.
Kater-Kuipers A; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RH; Bunnik EM
J Med Ethics; 2018 Sep; 44(9):626-631. PubMed ID: 29695408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new ethical landscape of prenatal testing: individualizing choice to serve autonomy and promote public health: a radical proposal.
Munthe C
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25521972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-cultural perspectives on decision making regarding noninvasive prenatal testing: A comparative study of Lebanon and Quebec.
Haidar H; Vanstone M; Laberge AM; Bibeau G; Ghulmiyyah L; Ravitsky V
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 29847254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome undermine informed choice?
Silcock C; Liao LM; Hill M; Chitty LS
Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1658-71. PubMed ID: 26039796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals.
van den Heuvel A; Chitty L; Dormandy E; Newson A; Deans Z; Attwood S; Haynes S; Marteau TM
Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Jan; 78(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 19560305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of pre-test counselling offered for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a primary screening tool.
Lee HYD; Chan LW
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2204959. PubMed ID: 37154788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Small cost to pay for peace of mind': Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing.
Bowman-Smart H; Savulescu J; Mand C; Gyngell C; Pertile MD; Lewis S; Delatycki MB
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Oct; 59(5):649-655. PubMed ID: 30724335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
Montgomery S; Thayer ZM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):630. PubMed ID: 33076858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal screening: an ethical agenda for the near future.
de Jong A; de Wert GM
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 25521973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland: a qualitative analysis.
Fang MT; Germani F; Spitale G; Wäscher S; Kunz L; Biller-Andorno N
BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):85. PubMed ID: 37872496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial.
Beulen L; van den Berg M; Faas BH; Feenstra I; Hageman M; van Vugt JM; Bekker MN
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Oct; 24(10):1409-16. PubMed ID: 27189020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Talking Points: Women's Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.
Dane AC; Peterson M; Miller YD
J Genet Couns; 2018 Sep; 27(5):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 29550971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing.
Wilson RD; De Bie I; Armour CM; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; Okun N; Nelson T; Zwingerman R; Audibert F; Brock JA; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; De Bie I; Johnson JA; Okun N; Pastruck M; Vallée-Pouliot K; Wilson RD; Zwingerman R; Armour C; Chitayat D; De Bie I; Fernandez S; Kim R; Lavoie J; Leonard N; Nelson T; Taylor S; Van Allen M; Van Karnebeek C
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Aug; 38(8):742-762.e3. PubMed ID: 27638987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
