229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32621789)
21. Investigating multi-objective fluence and beam orientation IMRT optimization.
Potrebko PS; Fiege J; Biagioli M; Poleszczuk J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(13):5228-5244. PubMed ID: 28493848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Pareto-based beam orientation optimization method for spot scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Kamal Sayed H; Herman MG; Beltran CJ
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2049-2060. PubMed ID: 32077497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Automatic IMRT planning via static field fluence prediction (AIP-SFFP): a deep learning algorithm for real-time prostate treatment planning.
Li X; Zhang J; Sheng Y; Chang Y; Yin FF; Ge Y; Wu QJ; Wang C
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(17):175014. PubMed ID: 32663813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Dose Prediction Models for Cervical Cancer Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.
Wu Z; Liu M; Pang Y; Deng L; Yang Y; Wu Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2024; 23():15330338241242654. PubMed ID: 38584413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. DVHnet: A deep learning-based prediction of patient-specific dose volume histograms for radiotherapy planning.
Chen X; Men K; Zhu J; Yang B; Li M; Liu Z; Yan X; Yi J; Dai J
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2705-2713. PubMed ID: 33550616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lung IMRT planning with automatic determination of beam angle configurations.
Yuan L; Zhu W; Ge Y; Jiang Y; Sheng Y; Yin FF; Wu QJ
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(13):135024. PubMed ID: 29846178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Study on the transferability of the knowledge-based VMAT model to predict IMRT plans in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Bi S; Sun X; Sohaimi WFBW; Yusoff ALB
Eur J Med Res; 2023 Aug; 28(1):309. PubMed ID: 37653551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Deep learning method for prediction of patient-specific dose distribution in breast cancer.
Ahn SH; Kim E; Kim C; Cheon W; Kim M; Lee SB; Lim YK; Kim H; Shin D; Kim DY; Jeong JH
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Aug; 16(1):154. PubMed ID: 34404441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An artificial intelligence-driven agent for real-time head-and-neck IMRT plan generation using conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN).
Li X; Wang C; Sheng Y; Zhang J; Wang W; Yin FF; Wu Q; Wu QJ; Ge Y
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):2714-2723. PubMed ID: 33577108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automatic treatment planning based on three-dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique.
Fan J; Wang J; Chen Z; Hu C; Zhang Z; Hu W
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):370-381. PubMed ID: 30383300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pareto-optimal plans as ground truth for validation of a commercial system for knowledge-based DVH-prediction.
Cagni E; Botti A; Wang Y; Iori M; Petit SF; Heijmen BJM
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():98-106. PubMed ID: 30471826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Beam mask and sliding window-facilitated deep learning-based accurate and efficient dose prediction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Zhang L; Holmes JM; Liu Z; Vora SA; Sio TT; Vargas CE; Yu NY; Keole SR; Schild SE; Bues M; Li S; Liu T; Shen J; Wong WW; Liu W
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1484-1498. PubMed ID: 37748037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Combining dense elements with attention mechanisms for 3D radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancers.
Cros S; Bouttier H; Nguyen-Tan PF; Vorontsov E; Kadoury S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13655. PubMed ID: 35661390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty.
Zhang X; Rong Y; Morrill S; Fang J; Narayanasamy G; Galhardo E; Maraboyina S; Croft C; Xia F; Penagaricano J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):19-26. PubMed ID: 29524301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A deep learning model to predict dose-volume histograms of organs at risk in radiotherapy treatment plans.
Liu Z; Chen X; Men K; Yi J; Dai J
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5467-5481. PubMed ID: 32677104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Retrospective study comparing MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) setup strategies for prostate treatment: repositioning vs. replanning.
Kim JI; Park JM; Choi CH; An HJ; Kim YJ; Kim JH
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):139. PubMed ID: 31387593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
