261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32622161)
1. Discordance Between the American Thyroid Association and the American College of Radiology Guideline Systems for Thyroid Nodule Biopsy.
Kim E; Pudhucode R; Chen H; Lindeman B
J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():469-474. PubMed ID: 32622161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Malignancy risk stratification and FNA recommendations for thyroid nodules: A comparison of ACR TI-RADS, AACE/ACE/AME and ATA guidelines.
Peng JY; Pan FS; Wang W; Wang Z; Shan QY; Lin JH; Luo J; Zheng YL; Hu HT; Ruan SM; Liang JY; Xie XY; Lu MD
Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(6):102625. PubMed ID: 32668355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does a higher American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) score forecast an increased risk of malignancy? A correlation study of ACR TI-RADS with FNA cytology in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Modi L; Sun W; Shafizadeh N; Negron R; Yee-Chang M; Zhou F; Simsir A; Sheth S; Brandler TC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Jul; 128(7):470-481. PubMed ID: 32078249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fine needle aspiration biopsy indications for thyroid nodules: compare a point-based risk stratification system with a pattern-based risk stratification system.
Ruan JL; Yang HY; Liu RB; Liang M; Han P; Xu XL; Luo BM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4871-4878. PubMed ID: 30715590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison and preliminary discussion of the reasons for the differences in diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA biopsies between the ACR TIRADS and 2015 ATA guidelines.
Wu XL; Du JR; Wang H; Jin CX; Sui GQ; Yang DY; Lin YQ; Luo Q; Fu P; Li HQ; Teng DK
Endocrine; 2019 Jul; 65(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 30830584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.
Gao L; Xi X; Jiang Y; Yang X; Wang Y; Zhu S; Lai X; Zhang X; Zhao R; Zhang B
Endocrine; 2019 Apr; 64(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 30659427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk-Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines with the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology and 2017 American College of Radiology Guidelines.
Ha EJ; Na DG; Moon WJ; Lee YH; Choi N
Thyroid; 2018 Nov; 28(11):1532-1537. PubMed ID: 30311862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic efficacy and inappropriate biopsy rate of ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines for thyroid nodules in children and adolescents.
Li G; Zhang B; Liu J; Xiong Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1052945. PubMed ID: 37051202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction in Thyroid Nodule Biopsies and Improved Accuracy with American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Farjat AE; Langer JE; Reading CC; Teefey SA; Abinanti N; Boschini FJ; Bronner AJ; Dahiya N; Hertzberg BS; Newman JR; Scanga D; Vogler RC; Tessler FN
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):185-193. PubMed ID: 29498593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Multidisciplinary Head-to-Head Comparison of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System and American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems.
Huang BL; Ebner SA; Makkar JS; Bentley-Hibbert S; McConnell RJ; Lee JA; Hecht EM; Kuo JH
Oncologist; 2020 May; 25(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 31740569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of the American Thyroid Association Guidelines and American College of Radiology TI-RADS.
Liu J; Guo Y; Xiao J; Chen L; Liang Z
Endocr Pract; 2021 Jul; 27(7):661-667. PubMed ID: 34250908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective Cohort Study of 1947 Thyroid Nodules: A Comparison of the 2017 American College of Radiology TI-RADS and the 2015 American Thyroid Association Classifications.
Pandya A; Caoili EM; Jawad-Makki F; Wasnik AP; Shankar PR; Bude R; Haymart MR; Davenport MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):900-906. PubMed ID: 32069084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the thyroid imaging, reporting, and data system (TI-RADS) scoring system for the evaluation of subcentimeter thyroid nodules.
Weiss VL; Andreotti RF; Ely KA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Aug; 126(8):518-524. PubMed ID: 29733503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Thyroid Risk Categorization Systems and Fine-Needle Aspiration Recommendations in a Multi-Institutional Thyroid Ultrasound Registry.
Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Langer JE; Schmidt K; Gillis LB; Nair SS; Watts JA; Snyder RW; Khot R; Rawal U; Tessler FN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1605-1613. PubMed ID: 34419476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of American College of Radiology TI-RADS, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology TIRADS, and American Thyroid Association Guidelines.
Middleton WD; Teefey SA; Reading CC; Langer JE; Beland MD; Szabunio MM; Desser TS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 29629797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the ACR TI-RADS scoring allow us to safely avoid unnecessary thyroid biopsy? single center analysis in a large cohort.
Koseoglu Atilla FD; Ozgen Saydam B; Erarslan NA; Diniz Unlu AG; Yilmaz Yasar H; Ozer M; Akinci B
Endocrine; 2018 Sep; 61(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 29744655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of Malignant Thyroid Nodules That Do Not Meet ACR TI-RADS Criteria for Fine-Needle Aspiration.
Middleton WD; Teefey SA; Tessler FN; Hoang JK; Reading CC; Langer JE; Beland MD; Szabunio MM; Desser TS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):471-478. PubMed ID: 32603228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Assessment of Thyroid Nodules Selected for Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration.
Tang AL; Falciglia M; Yang H; Mark JR; Steward DL
Thyroid; 2017 Aug; 27(8):1077-1082. PubMed ID: 28657511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ACR TI-RADS and ATA US scores are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.
Barbosa TLM; Junior COM; Graf H; Cavalvanti T; Trippia MA; da Silveira Ugino RT; de Oliveira GL; Granella VH; de Carvalho GA
BMC Endocr Disord; 2019 Oct; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 31664992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparisons of ACR TI-RADS, ATA guidelines, Kwak TI-RADS, and KTA/KSThR guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules.
Zhang WB; Xu HX; Zhang YF; Guo LH; Xu SH; Zhao CK; Liu BJ
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 75(2):219-232. PubMed ID: 31929154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
