387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32623761)
1. Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system.
Roberts KE; Cook CN; Beher J; Treml EA
Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):699-710. PubMed ID: 32623761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low connectivity between Mediterranean marine protected areas: a biophysical modeling approach for the dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus.
Andrello M; Mouillot D; Beuvier J; Albouy C; Thuiller W; Manel S
PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68564. PubMed ID: 23861917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An approach to incorporating inferred connectivity of adult movement into marine protected area design with limited data.
Friesen SK; Martone R; Rubidge E; Baggio JA; Ban NC
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jun; 29(4):e01890. PubMed ID: 30929286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design.
Green AL; Maypa AP; Almany GR; Rhodes KL; Weeks R; Abesamis RA; Gleason MG; Mumby PJ; White AT
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Nov; 90(4):1215-47. PubMed ID: 25423947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Larval Dispersal Modeling Reveals Low Connectivity among National Marine Protected Areas in the Yellow and East China Seas.
Lu J; Chen Y; Wang Z; Zhao F; Zhong Y; Zeng C; Cao L
Biology (Basel); 2023 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36979088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing spatial conservation prioritization methods with site- versus spatial dependency-based connectivity.
Muenzel D; Critchell K; Cox C; Campbell SJ; Jakub R; Chollett I; Krueck N; Holstein D; Treml EA; Beger M
Conserv Biol; 2023 Apr; 37(2):e14008. PubMed ID: 36178033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Larval dispersal connects fish populations in a network of marine protected areas.
Planes S; Jones GP; Thorrold SR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Apr; 106(14):5693-7. PubMed ID: 19307588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation.
Weeks R; Russ GR; Alcala AC; White AT
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):531-40. PubMed ID: 19843129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrating larval connectivity into the marine conservation decision-making process across spatial scales.
Muenzel D; Critchell K; Cox C; Campbell SJ; Jakub R; Suherfian W; Sara L; Chollett I; Treml EA; Beger M
Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14038. PubMed ID: 36478610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. β-diversity reveals ecological connectivity patterns underlying marine community recovery: Implications for conservation.
Bevilacqua S; Boero F; De Leo F; Guarnieri G; Mačić V; Benedetti-Cecchi L; Terlizzi A; Fraschetti S
Ecol Appl; 2023 Jul; 33(5):e2867. PubMed ID: 37114630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low connectivity compromises the conservation of reef fishes by marine protected areas in the tropical South Atlantic.
Endo CAK; Gherardi DFM; Pezzi LP; Lima LN
Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):8634. PubMed ID: 31201350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying biases in marine-protected-area placement relative to abatable threats.
Kuempel CD; Jones KR; Watson JEM; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 31131932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Weak biodiversity connectivity in the European network of no-take marine protected areas.
Assis J; Fragkopoulou E; Serrão EA; Horta E Costa B; Gandra M; Abecasis D
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 773():145664. PubMed ID: 33940752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating approaches for scaling-up community-based marine-protected areas into socially equitable and ecologically representative networks.
Kockel A; Ban NC; Costa M; Dearden P
Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31206826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ecological connectivity of the marine protected area network in the Baltic Sea, Kattegat and Skagerrak: Current knowledge and management needs.
Berkström C; Wennerström L; Bergström U
Ambio; 2022 Jun; 51(6):1485-1503. PubMed ID: 34964951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Drivers of ecological effectiveness of marine protected areas: A meta-analytic approach from the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (Brazil).
Ferreira HM; Magris RA; Floeter SR; Ferreira CEL
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113889. PubMed ID: 34610560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model-based assessment of persistence in proposed marine protected area designs.
Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; O'Farrell MR; Gaines SD; Jorgensen S
Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):433-48. PubMed ID: 19323201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marine protected areas increase resilience among coral reef communities.
Mellin C; Aaron MacNeil M; Cheal AJ; Emslie MJ; Julian Caley M
Ecol Lett; 2016 Jun; 19(6):629-37. PubMed ID: 27038889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anticipating changes to future connectivity within a network of marine protected areas.
Coleman MA; Cetina-Heredia P; Roughan M; Feng M; van Sebille E; Kelaher BP
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Sep; 23(9):3533-3542. PubMed ID: 28122402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
