These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
682 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32624193)
21. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial. Nørgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Ito H; Miyoshi T; Park SJ; Zvaigzne L; Tzemos N; Jensen JM; Hansson N; Ko B; Bezerra H; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 26298072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice. Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anatomical and Functional Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Celeng C; Leiner T; Maurovich-Horvat P; Merkely B; de Jong P; Dankbaar JW; van Es HW; Ghoshhajra BB; Hoffmann U; Takx RAP JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 12(7 Pt 2):1316-1325. PubMed ID: 30219398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic and Clinical Value of FFR Mickley H; Veien KT; Gerke O; Lambrechtsen J; Rohold A; Steffensen FH; Husic M; Akkan D; Busk M; Jessen LB; Jensen LO; Diederichsen A; Øvrehus KA JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 15(6):1046-1058. PubMed ID: 35680213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rationale, design and goals of the HeartFlow assessing diagnostic value of non-invasive FFR Chinnaiyan KM; Akasaka T; Amano T; Bax JJ; Blanke P; De Bruyne B; Kawasaki T; Leipsic J; Matsuo H; Morino Y; Nieman K; Norgaard BL; Patel MR; Pontone G; Rabbat M; Rogers C; Sand NP; Raff G J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28017291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: results from the DeFACTO study. Nakazato R; Park HB; Berman DS; Gransar H; Koo BK; Erglis A; Lin FY; Dunning AM; Budoff MJ; Malpeso J; Leipsic J; Min JK Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):881-9. PubMed ID: 24081777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Real-world validation of fractional flow reserve computed tomography in patients with stable angina: Results from the prospective AFFECTS trial. Lanfear AT; Meidan TG; Aldrich AI; Brant N; Squiers JJ; Shih E; Bhattal G; Banwait JK; McCracken J; Kindsvater S; Brown D; DiMaio JM Clin Imaging; 2022 Nov; 91():32-36. PubMed ID: 35986975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina: can CT compete with angiography? Liu X; Wang Y; Zhang H; Yin Y; Cao K; Gao Z; Liu H; Hau WK; Gao L; Chen Y; Cao F; Huang W Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3669-3677. PubMed ID: 30887203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Planning percutaneous coronary interventions using computed tomography angiography and fractional flow reserve-derived from computed tomography: A state-of-the-art review. Feldmann K; Cami E; Safian RD Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30286519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography on Heart Team Treatment Decision-Making in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION Trial. Andreini D; Modolo R; Katagiri Y; Mushtaq S; Sonck J; Collet C; De Martini S; Roberto M; Tanaka K; Miyazaki Y; Czapla J; Schoors D; Plass A; Maisano F; Kaufmann P; Orry X; Metzdorf PA; Folliguet T; Färber G; Diamantis I; Schönweiß M; Bonalumi G; Guglielmo M; Ferrari C; Olivares P; Cavallotti L; Leal I; Lindeboom W; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Bartorelli AL; Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e007607. PubMed ID: 31833413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does the Routine Availability of CT-Derived FFR Influence Management of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Compared to CT Angiography Alone?: The FFR Curzen NP; Nolan J; Zaman AG; Nørgaard BL; Rajani R JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 9(10):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 27568119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study. Gaur S; Achenbach S; Leipsic J; Mauri L; Bezerra HG; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(5):279-88. PubMed ID: 24268114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Real World Utilization of Computed Tomography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Single Center Experience in the United States. Fares A; Alaiti MA; Alkhalil A; Al-Kindi S; Chami T; Martin B; Thakker P; Nadeem F; Rajagopalan S; Simon D; Gilkeson R; Bezerra HG Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1043-1047. PubMed ID: 30833210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography reclassification rate using value distal to lesion compared to lowest value. Kueh SH; Mooney J; Ohana M; Kim U; Blanke P; Grover R; Sellers S; Ellis J; Murphy D; Hague C; Bax JJ; Nørgaard BL; Rabbat M; Leipsic JA J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):462-467. PubMed ID: 28986147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study. Douglas PS; Pontone G; Hlatky MA; Patel MR; Norgaard BL; Byrne RA; Curzen N; Purcell I; Gutberlet M; Rioufol G; Hink U; Schuchlenz HW; Feuchtner G; Gilard M; Andreini D; Jensen JM; Hadamitzky M; Chiswell K; Cyr D; Wilk A; Wang F; Rogers C; De Bruyne B; Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3359-67. PubMed ID: 26330417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical Use of Coronary CTA-Derived FFR for Decision-Making in Stable CAD. Nørgaard BL; Hjort J; Gaur S; Hansson N; Bøtker HE; Leipsic J; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Pedersen K; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Gormsen LC; Mæng M; Terkelsen CJ; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Jensen JM JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):541-550. PubMed ID: 27085447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR Nakanishi R; Osawa K; Ceponiene I; Huth G; Cole J; Kim M; Nezarat N; Rahmani S; Li D; Gupta S; Rogers C; Dailing C; Budoff MJ Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2067-2072. PubMed ID: 28699019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]