629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32624219)
1. Reproductive outcomes after in vitro fertilization treatment in a cohort of Danish women transplanted with cryopreserved ovarian tissue.
Dueholm Hjorth IM; Kristensen SG; Dueholm M; Humaidan P
Fertil Steril; 2020 Aug; 114(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 32624219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transplantations of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue demonstrate high reproductive performance and the need to revise restrictive criteria.
Meirow D; Ra'anani H; Shapira M; Brenghausen M; Derech Chaim S; Aviel-Ronen S; Amariglio N; Schiff E; Orvieto R; Dor J
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 27181924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ovarian stimulation and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in women transplanted with cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a systematic review.
Andersen ST; Pors SE; Poulsen LC; Colmorn LB; Macklon KT; Ernst E; Humaidan P; Andersen CY; Kristensen SG
Fertil Steril; 2019 Nov; 112(5):908-921. PubMed ID: 31594631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.
Gerber RS; Fazzari M; Kappy M; Cohen A; Galperin S; Lieman H; Jindal S; Buyuk E
Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 33012553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of assisted reproductive technology after ovarian tissue transplantation in a cohort of 11 patients with or without associated infertility factors.
Vatel M; Torre A; Paillusson B; Scheffler F; Bergere M; Benkhalifa M; Le Martelot MT; Leperlier F; Mirallié S; Selleret L; Prades-Borio M; Neuraz A; Barraud-Lange V; Boissel N; Fortin A; Poirot C
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Feb; 38(2):503-511. PubMed ID: 33389379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance.
Morin SJ; Patounakis G; Juneau CR; Neal SA; Scott RT; Seli E
Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1489-1498. PubMed ID: 30010882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of ovarian tissue transplantation: results from three clinical centers.
Shapira M; Dolmans MM; Silber S; Meirow D
Fertil Steril; 2020 Aug; 114(2):388-397. PubMed ID: 32605799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in the Danish fertility preservation cohort.
Kristensen SG; Wakimoto Y; Colmorn LB; Dueholm M; Pors SE; Macklon KT; Mamsen LS; Nikiforov D; Cadenas J; Greve VH; Bay Bjørn AM; Rosendahl M; Pedersen AT; Nyboe Andersen A; Fedder J; Ernst E; Andersen CY
Fertil Steril; 2021 Oct; 116(4):1098-1106. PubMed ID: 34130800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Qin N; Chen Q; Hong Q; Cai R; Gao H; Wang Y; Sun L; Zhang S; Guo H; Fu Y; Ai A; Tian H; Lyu Q; Daya S; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):334-341.e1. PubMed ID: 27114329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oocyte or embryo number needed to optimize live birth and cumulative live birth rates in mild stimulation IVF cycles.
Datta AK; Campbell S; Felix N; Singh JSH; Nargund G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Aug; 43(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 34140227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nondominant small follicles are a promising source of mature oocytes in modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Teramoto S; Osada H; Sato Y; Shozu M
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):113-118. PubMed ID: 27041027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High FSH dosing is associated with reduced live birth rate in fresh but not subsequent frozen embryo transfers.
Munch EM; Sparks AE; Zimmerman MB; Van Voorhis BJ; Duran EH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1402-1409. PubMed ID: 28472321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biopsying, fragmentation and autotransplantation of fresh ovarian cortical tissue in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve.
Lunding SA; Pors SE; Kristensen SG; Landersoe SK; Jeppesen JV; Flachs EM; Pinborg A; Macklon KT; Pedersen AT; Andersen CY; Andersen AN
Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1924-1936. PubMed ID: 31593582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.
Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.
Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Planned oocyte cryopreservation-10-15-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes.
Blakemore JK; Grifo JA; DeVore SM; Hodes-Wertz B; Berkeley AS
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1511-1520. PubMed ID: 33712289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
