These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32624222)

  • 1. A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator.
    Park JH; Lee GH; Moon DN; Kim JC; Park M; Lee KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):849-853. PubMed ID: 32624222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Indirect Digital Technique to Transfer 3D Printed Casts to a Mechanical Articulator With Individual Sagittal Condylar Inclination Settings Using CBCT and Intraoral Scans.
    Yang S; Dong B; Zhang Q; Li J; Yuan Q; Yue L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):822-827. PubMed ID: 35864801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mounting casts on a mechanical articulator by using digital multisource data: A dental technique.
    Kim JE; Kim SJ; Kwon DH; Shim JS; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 32033790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting the Sagittal Condylar Inclination on a Virtual Articulator Using Intraoral Scan of Protrusive Interocclusal Position and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Hong SJ; Choi Y; Park M; Paek J; Pae A; Kim HS; Kwon KR; Noh K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):185-189. PubMed ID: 31919939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Method and accuracy of determining the jaw position of repositioning splint with the aid of digital technique].
    Fang SB; Yang GJ; Kang YF; Sun YC; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 33550339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Full-Digital Technique to Mount a Maxillary Arch Scan on a Virtual Articulator.
    Lepidi L; Chen Z; Ravida A; Lan T; Wang HL; Li J
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):335-338. PubMed ID: 30663165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M; Ding Q; Li L; Yang G; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhang L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using a single cone-beam computed tomography scan to obtain full occlusal details, with the mandible in centric relation and maximum intercuspation.
    El-Beialy AR; El Nigoumi A; Kaddah A; Afify H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):741-746. PubMed ID: 29706222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recording condylar movement with two facebow systems.
    Hicks ST; Wood DP
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 8863965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records.
    Li J; Chen Z; Decker AM; Wang HL; Joda T; Mendonca G; Lepidi L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 33876857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual Articulators and Virtual Mounting Procedures: Where Do We Stand?
    Lepidi L; Galli M; Mastrangelo F; Venezia P; Joda T; Wang HL; Li J
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Jan; 30(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 32827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual bite registration using intraoral digital scanning, CT and CBCT: In vitro evaluation of a new method and its implication for orthognathic surgery.
    Nilsson J; Richards RG; Thor A; Kamer L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 27423538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator.
    Úry E; Fornai C; Weber GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 31227241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The patient-specific anatomical articulator.
    Azer SS; Kemper E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1158-1164. PubMed ID: 33814096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital to Analog Facially Generated Interchangeable Facebow Transfer: Capturing a Standardized Reference Position.
    Kois JC; Kois DE; Zeitler JM; Martin J
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):13-22. PubMed ID: 34605582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A reevaluation of the axis-orbital plane and the use of orbitale in a facebow transfer record.
    Pitchford JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 1800732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Geometric analysis of occlusal plane orientation using simulated ear-rod facebow transfer.
    dos Santos Júnior J; Nelson SJ; Nummikoski P
    J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):172-81. PubMed ID: 9028221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of the ability of computerized axiography to reproduce occlusal contacts.
    Franklin P; McLelland R; Brunton P
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 20397498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct transfer of the position of digitized casts to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Etxaniz O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jun; 109(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 23763787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.