These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32625401)

  • 1. Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for in-soil organisms.
    ; Ockleford C; Adriaanse P; Berny P; Brock T; Duquesne S; Grilli S; Hernandez-Jerez AF; Bennekou SH; Klein M; Kuhl T; Laskowski R; Machera K; Pelkonen O; Pieper S; Stemmer M; Sundh I; Teodorovic I; Tiktak A; Topping CJ; Wolterink G; Craig P; de Jong F; Manachini B; Sousa P; Swarowsky K; Auteri D; Arena M; Rob S
    EFSA J; 2017 Feb; 15(2):e04690. PubMed ID: 32625401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental risk assessment of PPP application in European soils and potential ecosystem service losses considering impacts on non-target organisms.
    Urionabarrenetxea E; Casás C; Garcia-Velasco N; Santos MJG; Tarazona JV; Soto M
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Nov; 266():115577. PubMed ID: 37839184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles.
    ; Ockleford C; Adriaanse P; Berny P; Brock T; Duquesne S; Grilli S; Hernandez-Jerez AF; Bennekou SH; Klein M; Kuhl T; Laskowski R; Machera K; Pelkonen O; Pieper S; Stemmer M; Sundh I; Teodorovic I; Tiktak A; Topping CJ; Wolterink G; Aldrich A; Berg C; Ortiz-Santaliestra M; Weir S; Streissl F; Smith RH
    EFSA J; 2018 Feb; 16(2):e05125. PubMed ID: 32625798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved assessment of the impacts of plant protection products on certain soil ecosystem services requires better consideration of terrestrial microalgae and cyanobacteria.
    Bérard A; Crouzet O; Morin S; Pesce S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38010548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A spatiotemporally explicit modeling approach for more realistic exposure and risk assessment of off-field soil organisms.
    Schad T; Bub S; Wang M; Holmes CM; Kleinmann J; Hammel K; Ernst G; Preuss TG
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Jan; 20(1):263-278. PubMed ID: 37340847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting environmental concentrations and the potential risk of Plant Protection Products (PPP) on non-target soil organisms accounting for regional and landscape ecological variability in european soils.
    Urionabarrenetxea E; Casás C; Garcia-Velasco N; Santos M; Tarazona JV; Soto M
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 2):135045. PubMed ID: 35609662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides.
    Nienstedt KM; Brock TC; van Wensem J; Montforts M; Hart A; Aagaard A; Alix A; Boesten J; Bopp SK; Brown C; Capri E; Forbes V; Köpp H; Liess M; Luttik R; Maltby L; Sousa JP; Streissl F; Hardy AR
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 415():31-8. PubMed ID: 21733564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and the Need for a Meaningful Regulatory Plant Protection Product Testing Strategy.
    Sweeney CJ; Bottoms M; Ellis S; Ernst G; Kimmel S; Loutseti S; Schimera A; Carniel LSC; Sharples A; Staab F; Marx MT
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Aug; 41(8):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 35678214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wildlife ecotoxicology of plant protection products: knowns and unknowns about the impacts of currently used pesticides on terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity.
    Fritsch C; Berny P; Crouzet O; Le Perchec S; Coeurdassier M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38639904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statement of the PPR Panel on a framework for conducting the environmental exposure and risk assessment for transition metals when used as active substances in plant protection products (PPP).
    ; Hernandez-Jerez A; Adriaanse P; Aldrich A; Berny P; Coja T; Duquesne S; Focks A; Marina M; Millet M; Pelkonen O; Tiktak A; Topping C; Widenfalk A; Wilks M; Wolterink G; Conrad A; Pieper S
    EFSA J; 2021 Mar; 19(3):e06498. PubMed ID: 33815619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soil Biodiversity: State-of-the-Art and Possible Implementation in Chemical Risk Assessment.
    van Gestel CA; Mommer L; Montanarella L; Pieper S; Coulson M; Toschki A; Rutgers M; Focks A; Römbke J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 May; 17(3):541-551. PubMed ID: 33210820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critical review of effect modeling for ecological risk assessment of plant protection products.
    Larras F; Charles S; Chaumot A; Pelosi C; Le Gall M; Mamy L; Beaudouin R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(29):43448-43500. PubMed ID: 35391640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of copper as plant protection product contributes to environmental contamination and resulting impacts on terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem functions.
    Pesce S; Mamy L; Sanchez W; Artigas J; Bérard A; Betoulle S; Chaumot A; Coutellec MA; Crouzet O; Faburé J; Hedde M; Leboulanger C; Margoum C; Martin-Laurent F; Morin S; Mougin C; Munaron D; Nélieu S; Pelosi C; Leenhardt S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38324154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking ecotoxicological effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions to impairment of ecosystem services is a challenge: an illustration with the case of plant protection products.
    Pesce S; Bérard A; Coutellec MA; Hedde M; Langlais-Hesse A; Larras F; Leenhardt S; Mongruel R; Munaron D; Sabater S; Gallai N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37548787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A risk assessment example for soil invertebrates using spatially explicit agent-based models.
    Reed M; Alvarez T; Chelinho S; Forbes V; Johnston A; Meli M; Voss F; Pastorok R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jan; 12(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 26411378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward the definition of specific protection goals for the environmental risk assessment of chemicals: A perspective on environmental regulation in Europe.
    Brown AR; Whale G; Jackson M; Marshall S; Hamer M; Solga A; Kabouw P; Galay-Burgos M; Woods R; Nadzialek S; Maltby L
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):17-37. PubMed ID: 27243906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing single effects of sugarcane pesticides fipronil and 2,4-D on plants and soil organisms.
    Triques MC; Oliveira D; Goulart BV; Montagner CC; Espíndola ELG; de Menezes-Oliveira VB
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Jan; 208():111622. PubMed ID: 33396142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neglected impacts of plant protection products on invertebrate aquatic biodiversity: a focus on eco-evolutionary processes.
    Coutellec MA; Chaumot A; Sucré E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38459285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanistic Effect Modeling of Earthworms in the Context of Pesticide Risk Assessment: Synthesis of the FORESEE Workshop.
    Forbes VE; Agatz A; Ashauer R; Butt KR; Capowiez Y; Duquesne S; Ernst G; Focks A; Gergs A; Hodson ME; Holmstrup M; Johnston AS; Meli M; Nickisch D; Pieper S; Rakel KJ; Reed M; Roembke J; Schäfer RB; Thorbek P; Spurgeon DJ; Van den Berg E; Van Gestel CA; Zorn MI; Roeben V
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Mar; 17(2):352-363. PubMed ID: 32910508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR).
    Velbel MA; Cockell CS; Glavin DP; Marty B; Regberg AB; Smith AL; Tosca NJ; Wadhwa M; Kminek G; Meyer MA; Beaty DW; Carrier BL; Haltigin T; Hays LE; Agee CB; Busemann H; Cavalazzi B; Debaille V; Grady MM; Hauber E; Hutzler A; McCubbin FM; Pratt LM; Smith CL; Summons RE; Swindle TD; Tait KT; Udry A; Usui T; Westall F; Zorzano MP
    Astrobiology; 2022 Jun; 22(S1):S112-S164. PubMed ID: 34904892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.