These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32627053)

  • 1. Aging and working memory modulate the ability to benefit from visible speech and iconic gestures during speech-in-noise comprehension.
    Schubotz L; Holler J; Drijvers L; Özyürek A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jul; 85(5):1997-2011. PubMed ID: 32627053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual Context Enhanced: The Joint Contribution of Iconic Gestures and Visible Speech to Degraded Speech Comprehension.
    Drijvers L; Özyürek A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 27960196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Encoding and memory for visible speech and gestures: a comparison between young and older adults.
    Thompson LA
    Psychol Aging; 1995 Jun; 10(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 7662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effects of Iconic Gestures and Babble Language on Word Intelligibility in Sentence Context.
    Wilms V; Drijvers L; Brouwer S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 May; 65(5):1822-1838. PubMed ID: 35439423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of iconic gestures and mouth movements in face-to-face communication.
    Krason A; Fenton R; Varley R; Vigliocco G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):600-612. PubMed ID: 34671936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Degree of Language Experience Modulates Visual Attention to Visible Speech and Iconic Gestures During Clear and Degraded Speech Comprehension.
    Drijvers L; Vaitonytė J; Özyürek A
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Oct; 43(10):e12789. PubMed ID: 31621126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliance on visible speech cues during multimodal language processing: individual and age differences.
    Thompson L; Garcia E; Malloy D
    Exp Aging Res; 2007; 33(4):373-97. PubMed ID: 17886014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
    Krull V; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Co-speech iconic gestures and visuo-spatial working memory.
    Wu YC; Coulson S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():39-50. PubMed ID: 25282199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some limits on encoding visible speech and gestures using a dichotic shadowing task.
    Thompson LA; Guzman FA
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 1999 Nov; 54(6):P347-9. PubMed ID: 10625962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-native Listeners Benefit Less from Gestures and Visible Speech than Native Listeners During Degraded Speech Comprehension.
    Drijvers L; Özyürek A
    Lang Speech; 2020 Jun; 63(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 30795715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verbal working memory and co-speech gesture processing.
    Momsen J; Gordon J; Wu YC; Coulson S
    Brain Cogn; 2020 Dec; 146():105640. PubMed ID: 33171343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ageing, working memory, and mental imagery: Understanding gestural communication in younger and older adults.
    Arslan B; Göksun T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 32640872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Native and non-native listeners show similar yet distinct oscillatory dynamics when using gestures to access speech in noise.
    Drijvers L; van der Plas M; Özyürek A; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 194():55-67. PubMed ID: 30905837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iconic Gestures Facilitate Discourse Comprehension in Individuals With Superior Immediate Memory for Body Configurations.
    Wu YC; Coulson S
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1717-27. PubMed ID: 26381507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musical Experience Offsets Age-Related Decline in Understanding Speech-in-Noise: Type of Training Does Not Matter, Working Memory Is the Key.
    Zhang L; Fu X; Luo D; Xing L; Du Y
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 32826504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do Children Understand Iconic Gestures About Events as Early as Iconic Gestures About Entities?
    Glasser ML; Williamson RA; Özçalışkan Ş
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):741-754. PubMed ID: 29305747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construing events first-hand: Gesture viewpoints interact with speech to shape the attribution and memory of agency.
    Chan DM; Kelly S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):884-894. PubMed ID: 33415717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.