These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32628035)

  • 21. Direct evidence for proactive suppression of salient-but-irrelevant emotional information inputs.
    Xu L; Yang Z; Ji H; Chen W; Lin Z; Huang Y; Ding X
    Emotion; 2023 Oct; 23(7):2039-2058. PubMed ID: 36862454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104554. PubMed ID: 33360961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reward predictions bias attentional selection.
    Anderson BA; Laurent PA; Yantis S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():262. PubMed ID: 23781185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention II: Evidence from within-domain additivity.
    Ogden A; Kim H; Anderson BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 36536205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Capture or suppression? Attentional allocation upon reward and loss-associated nonsalient distractors are supported by distinct neural mechanisms: An EEG study.
    Jiang Y; Cui C; Liu M; Zhang X
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 157():107879. PubMed ID: 33957194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reward history modulates perceptual load effects.
    Matias J; Quinton JC; Colomb M; Izaute M; Silvert L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103217. PubMed ID: 33310345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learned prioritization yields attentional biases through selection history.
    Munneke J; E Corbett J; van der Burg E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2244-2256. PubMed ID: 31974938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Not looking for any trouble? Purely affective attentional settings do not induce goal-driven attentional capture.
    Brown CRH; Berggren N; Forster S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1150-1165. PubMed ID: 31773510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the resilience of reward cues attentional salience to reward devaluation, time, incentive learning, and contingency remapping.
    De Tommaso M; Turatto M
    Behav Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 135(3):389-401. PubMed ID: 33914569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Eating restraint is associated with reduced attentional capture by signals of valuable food reward.
    Watson P; Vasudevan A; Pearson D; Le Pelley ME
    Appetite; 2021 Apr; 159():105050. PubMed ID: 33249010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture.
    Anderson BA; Kim H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):607-613. PubMed ID: 30697647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distractors associated with reward break through the focus of attention.
    Munneke J; Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2213-25. PubMed ID: 26932872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spatial task relevance modulates value-driven attentional capture.
    Ma X; Abrams RA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1826-1844. PubMed ID: 35732924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search.
    Le Pelley ME; Ung R; Mine C; Most SB; Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1446-1459. PubMed ID: 35013993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reward history but not search history explains value-driven attentional capture.
    Marchner JR; Preuschhof C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1436-1448. PubMed ID: 29675555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
    Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat.
    Kim AJ; Anderson BA
    eNeuro; 2020; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 32601095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.