These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32628356)

  • 1. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
    Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
    Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
    Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
    Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic Factors and Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.
    Kim JH; Shim SH; Nam SH; Lee SW; Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1558-1565. PubMed ID: 32084588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimal-invasive or open approach for surgery of early cervical cancer: the treatment center matters.
    Gennari P; Gerken M; Mészáros J; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Ortmann O; Eggemann H; Ignatov A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Aug; 304(2):503-510. PubMed ID: 33483846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
    Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic value of ABO blood group in patients with early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy with pelvic node dissection.
    Hanprasertpong J; Jiamset I; Atjimakul T
    Tumour Biol; 2016 Jun; 37(6):7421-30. PubMed ID: 26678885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
    Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao MM; Cibula D; Wu X; Falconer H; Persson J; Perrotta M; Mosgaard BJ; Kucukmetin A; Berlev I; Rendon G; Liu K; Vieira M; Capilna ME; Fotopoulou C; Baiocchi G; Kaidarova D; Ribeiro R; Pedra-Nobre S; Kocian R; Li X; Li J; Pálsdóttir K; Noll F; Rundle S; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Gheorghe M; Saso S; Bolatbekova R; Tsunoda A; Pitcher B; Wu J; Urbauer D; Pareja R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):97.e1-97.e16. PubMed ID: 34461074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
    Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.
    Wenzel HHB; Smolders RGV; Beltman JJ; Lambrechts S; Trum HW; Yigit R; Zusterzeel PLM; Zweemer RP; Mom CH; Bekkers RLM; Lemmens VEPP; Nijman HW; Van der Aa MA
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Jul; 133():14-21. PubMed ID: 32422504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
    He J; Hao M; Liu P; Liu Z; Lang J; Bin X; Chen C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 32699022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.