These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32628356)
21. Survival associated with extent of radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a subanalysis of the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative study. Bizzarri N; Querleu D; Dostálek L; van Lonkhuijzen LRCW; Giannarelli D; Lopez A; Salehi S; Ayhan A; Kim SH; Ortiz DI; Klat J; Landoni F; Pareja R; Manchanda R; Kosťun J; Ramirez PT; Meydanli MM; Odetto D; Laky R; Zapardiel I; Weinberger V; Dos Reis R; Pedone Anchora L; Amaro K; Akilli H; Abu-Rustum NR; Salcedo-Hernández RA; Javůrková V; Mom CH; Scambia G; Falconer H; Cibula D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):428.e1-428.e12. PubMed ID: 37336255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Melamed A; Margul DJ; Chen L; Keating NL; Del Carmen MG; Yang J; Seagle BL; Alexander A; Barber EL; Rice LW; Wright JD; Kocherginsky M; Shahabi S; Rauh-Hain JA N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 30379613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study. Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Locoregional spread and survival of stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer. Hongladaromp W; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):887-90. PubMed ID: 24568513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes. Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on oncological outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma with only intermediate-risk factors: a propensity score matching analysis. Turkmen O; Kilic F; Tokalioglu AA; Cakir C; Yuksel D; Kilic C; Boran N; Kimyon Comert G; Turan T J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 42(7):3204-3211. PubMed ID: 35959796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Kim Y; Kim SI; Kim H; Lee M; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Lee C; Suh DH Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35970602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy. Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients with stage IA-IIA2 cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma after radical hysterectomy: A propensity score-matched real-world analysis. Liang C; Su G; Sun L; Zhao H; Liu P; Chen C Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):272-281. PubMed ID: 38287671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study. Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D; Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China. Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How to Select Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients Still Suitable for Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: a Propensity-Matched Study. Pedone Anchora L; Turco LC; Bizzarri N; Capozzi VA; Lombisani A; Chiantera V; De Felice F; Gallotta V; Cosentino F; Fagotti A; Ferrandina G; Scambia G Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 31898100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period. Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Survival outcomes of single-port access laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Eoh KJ; Li LY; Shin W; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():140-145. PubMed ID: 32891319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes. Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study. Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm. Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]