168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32628934)
1. Studies on the Performance of Molar Porous Root-Analogue Implant by Finite Element Model Simulation and Verification of a Case Report.
Guo F; Hu M; Wang C; Huang S; Lou M; Liu C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 78(11):1965.e1-1965.e9. PubMed ID: 32628934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immediate, non-submerged, three-dimensionally printed, one-piece mandibular molar porous root-analogue titanium implants: A 2-year prospective study involving 18 patients.
Liu C; Huang S; Guo F; Li Y; Zhao B; Luo A; Liu H; Wang C; Hu M; Zhou H
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 123(6):e770-e776. PubMed ID: 35598871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Porous Microstructures on the Biomechanical Characteristics of a Root Analogue Implant: An Animal Study and a Finite Element Analysis.
Liu T; Chen Y; Apicella A; Mu Z; Yu T; Huang Y; Wang C
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2020 Nov; 6(11):6356-6367. PubMed ID: 33449664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Porous structure design and mechanical behavior analysis based on TPMS for customized root analogue implant.
Song K; Wang Z; Lan J; Ma S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104222. PubMed ID: 33310682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element and experimental analysis to select patient's bone condition specific porous dental implant, fabricated using additive manufacturing.
Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Mondal SC; Roychowdhury A
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103839. PubMed ID: 32763517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design and manufacture of customized dental implants by using reverse engineering and selective laser melting technology.
Chen J; Zhang Z; Chen X; Zhang C; Zhang G; Xu Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1088-95.e1. PubMed ID: 24939253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structural Design and Finite Element Simulation Analysis of Grade 3 Graded Porous Titanium Implant.
Liu B; Xu W; Chen M; Chen D; Sun G; Zhang C; Pan Y; Lu J; Guo E; Lu X
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 36077485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Studies on the performance of selective laser melting porous dental implant by finite element model simulation, fatigue testing and in vivo experiments.
Wang Y; Chen X; Zhang C; Feng W; Zhang P; Chen Y; Huang J; Luo Y; Chen J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Feb; 233(2):170-180. PubMed ID: 30565502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bionic mechanical design and 3D printing of novel porous Ti6Al4V implants for biomedical applications.
Peng WM; Liu YF; Jiang XF; Dong XT; Jun J; Baur DA; Xu JJ; Pan H; Xu X
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2019 Aug.; 20(8):647-659. PubMed ID: 31273962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of immediately static loading on osteointegration and osteogenesis around 3D-printed porous implant: A histological and biomechanical study.
Yu T; Gao H; Liu T; Huang Y; Wang C
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Mar; 108():110406. PubMed ID: 31924051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Root-Analog Implants and Standardized Specimens Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting.
Zhao B; Liu C; Sun Z; Zhao X; Hu M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(6):1176-1185. PubMed ID: 36450023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical response at peri-implant mandibular bone for variation of pore characteristics of implants: A Finite Element Study.
Sarkar S; Sahu TP; Datta A; Chandra N; Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Chowdhury AR
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 31741483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of preemptively constructed, cone beam CT-, and CAD/CAM technology-based, individual Root Analogue Implant technique: an in vitro pilot investigation.
Moin DA; Hassan B; Parsa A; Mercelis P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 23278702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different mucosal resiliency and denture reline on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during osseointegration. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; dos Santos MB
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e833-7. PubMed ID: 21981046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel adaptive finite element algorithms to predict bone ingrowth in additive manufactured porous implants.
Cheong VS; Fromme P; Mumith A; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():230-239. PubMed ID: 30086415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. Part II: biomechanical integrity at bone-implant interface.
Shibata Y; Tanimoto Y; Maruyama N; Nagakura M
J Prosthodont Res; 2015 Apr; 59(2):84-95. PubMed ID: 25797023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
