180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32629135)
1. Genetically-programmed, mesenchymal stromal cell-laden & mechanically strong 3D bioprinted scaffolds for bone repair.
Abu Awwad HAM; Thiagarajan L; Kanczler JM; Amer MH; Bruce G; Lanham S; Rumney RMH; Oreffo ROC; Dixon JE
J Control Release; 2020 Sep; 325():335-346. PubMed ID: 32629135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Adamek P; Paul GR; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 114():307-322. PubMed ID: 32673752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model.
Liu B; Li J; Lei X; Cheng P; Song Y; Gao Y; Hu J; Wang C; Zhang S; Li D; Wu H; Sang H; Bi L; Pei G
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Jul; 112():110905. PubMed ID: 32409059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.
Zhang J; Eyisoylu H; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():637-652. PubMed ID: 33326888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanically tunable photo-cross-linkable bioinks for osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in 3D bioprinted constructs.
Kamaraj M; Sreevani G; Prabusankar G; Rath SN
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Dec; 131():112478. PubMed ID: 34857263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioprinting of Stem Cells in Multimaterial Scaffolds and Their Applications in Bone Tissue Engineering.
Tharakan S; Khondkar S; Ilyas A
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D bioprinting of cartilaginous templates for large bone defect healing.
Pitacco P; Sadowska JM; O'Brien FJ; Kelly DJ
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():61-74. PubMed ID: 35907556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Injectable degradable PVA microgels prepared by microfluidic technology for controlled osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.
Hou Y; Xie W; Achazi K; Cuellar-Camacho JL; Melzig MF; Chen W; Haag R
Acta Biomater; 2018 Sep; 77():28-37. PubMed ID: 29981495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low temperature hybrid 3D printing of hierarchically porous bone tissue engineering scaffolds with
Lai J; Wang C; Liu J; Chen S; Liu C; Huang X; Wu J; Pan Y; Xie Y; Wang M
Biofabrication; 2022 Aug; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 35896092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Translational Potential of Human Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells from Different Bone Entities for Autologous 3D Bioprinted Bone Grafts.
Amler AK; Dinkelborg PH; Schlauch D; Spinnen J; Stich S; Lauster R; Sittinger M; Nahles S; Heiland M; Kloke L; Rendenbach C; Beck-Broichsitter B; Dehne T
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33466904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of culture conditions on the bone regeneration potential of osteoblast-laden 3D bioprinted constructs.
Raveendran N; Ivanovski S; Vaquette C
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():190-201. PubMed ID: 36155098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D bioprinting mesenchymal stem cell-laden construct with core-shell nanospheres for cartilage tissue engineering.
Zhu W; Cui H; Boualam B; Masood F; Flynn E; Rao RD; Zhang ZY; Zhang LG
Nanotechnology; 2018 May; 29(18):185101. PubMed ID: 29446757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aspiration-assisted bioprinting of co-cultured osteogenic spheroids for bone tissue engineering.
Heo DN; Ayan B; Dey M; Banerjee D; Wee H; Lewis GS; Ozbolat IT
Biofabrication; 2020 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 33059343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osteoregenerative Potential of 3D-Printed Poly
Lawrence LM; Salary RR; Miller V; Valluri A; Denning KL; Case-Perry S; Abdelgaber K; Smith S; Claudio PP; Day JB
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Mar; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 36902373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bioprinting EphrinB2-Modified Dental Pulp Stem Cells with Enhanced Osteogenic Capacity for Alveolar Bone Engineering.
Wang W; Zhu Y; Li J; Geng T; Jia J; Wang X; Yuan C; Wang P
Tissue Eng Part A; 2023 Apr; 29(7-8):244-255. PubMed ID: 36606680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GelMA/bioactive silica nanocomposite bioinks for stem cell osteogenic differentiation.
Tavares MT; Gaspar VM; Monteiro MV; S Farinha JP; Baleizão C; Mano JF
Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33455952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D bioprinting of in situ vascularized tissue engineered bone for repairing large segmental bone defects.
Shen M; Wang L; Gao Y; Feng L; Xu C; Li S; Wang X; Wu Y; Guo Y; Pei G
Mater Today Bio; 2022 Dec; 16():100382. PubMed ID: 36033373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nanoengineered Osteoinductive Bioink for 3D Bioprinting Bone Tissue.
Chimene D; Miller L; Cross LM; Jaiswal MK; Singh I; Gaharwar AK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Apr; 12(14):15976-15988. PubMed ID: 32091189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inkjet-bioprinted acrylated peptides and PEG hydrogel with human mesenchymal stem cells promote robust bone and cartilage formation with minimal printhead clogging.
Gao G; Yonezawa T; Hubbell K; Dai G; Cui X
Biotechnol J; 2015 Oct; 10(10):1568-77. PubMed ID: 25641582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
